Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:24:07.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CONSISTENT MODEL SPECIFICATION TESTS

Kernel-Based Tests Versus Bierens' ICM Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2000

Yanqin Fan
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
Qi Li
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University and University of Guelph
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We point out the close relationship between the integrated conditional moment tests in Bierens (1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134) and Bierens and Ploberger (1997, Econometrica 65, 1129–1152) with the complex-valued exponential weight function and the kernel-based tests in Härdle and Mammen (1993, Annals of Statistics 21, 1926–1947), Li and Wang (1998, Journal of Econometrics 87, 145–165), and Zheng (1996, Journal of Econometrics 75, 263–289). It is well established that the integrated conditional moment tests of Bierens (1982) and Bierens and Ploberger (1997) are more powerful than kernel-based nonparametric tests against Pitman local alternatives. In this paper we analyze the power properties of the kernel-based tests and the integrated conditional moment tests for a sequence of “singular” local alternatives, and show that the kernel-based tests can be more powerful than the integrated conditional moment tests for these “singular” local alternatives. These results suggest that integrated conditional moment tests and kernel-based tests should be viewed as complements to each other. Results from a simulation study are in agreement with the theoretical results.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press