Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:16:15.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DETECTING FOR SMOOTH STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN GARCH MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Bin Chen  and
Yongmiao Hong
Bin Chen*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Yongmiao Hong*
Affiliation:
Cornell University and Xiamen University
*
*Address correspondence to Bin Chen, Department of Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA; e-mail: bchen8@mail.rochester.edu; Yongmiao Hong, Department of Economics & Department of Statistical Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA and Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE) and MOE Key Laboratory in Econometrics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; e-mail: yh20@cornell.edu.
*Address correspondence to Bin Chen, Department of Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA; e-mail: bchen8@mail.rochester.edu; Yongmiao Hong, Department of Economics & Department of Statistical Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA and Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE) and MOE Key Laboratory in Econometrics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; e-mail: yh20@cornell.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Detecting and modeling structural changes in GARCH processes have attracted increasing attention in time series econometrics. In this paper, we propose a new approach to testing structural changes in GARCH models. The idea is to compare the log likelihood of a time-varying parameter GARCH model with that of a constant parameter GARCH model, where the time-varying GARCH parameters are estimated by a local quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) and the constant GARCH parameters are estimated by a standard QMLE. The test does not require any prior information about the alternatives of structural changes. It has an asymptotic N(0,1) distribution under the null hypothesis of parameter constancy and is consistent against a vast class of smooth structural changes as well as abrupt structural breaks with possibly unknown break points. A consistent parametric bootstrap is employed to provide a reliable inference in finite samples and a simulation study highlights the merits of our test.

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 740 - 791
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

References

REFERENCES

Amado, C. & Teräsvirta, T. (2008) Modelling Conditional and Unconditional Heteroskedasticity with Smoothly Time-Varying Structure. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T. (1985) Advanced Econometrics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Andreou, E. & Ghysels, E. (2002) Detecting multiple breaks in financial market volatility dynamics. Journal of Applied Econometrics 17, 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K., Lee, I., & Ploberger, W. (1996) Optimal changepoint tests for normal linear regression. Journal of Econometrics 70, 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, A. & Kristensen, D. (2012) Testing conditional factor models. Journal of Financial Economics 106, 132–156.Google Scholar
Bai, J. & Perron, P. (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66, 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, I., Gombay, E., Horvath, L., & Kokoszka, P. (2004) Sequential change-point detection in GARCH (p,q) models. Econometric Theory 20, 1140–1167.Google Scholar
Berkes, I., Horvath, L., & Kokoszka, P. (2003) GARCH processes: Structure and estimation. Bernoulli 9, 201–227.Google Scholar
Bougerol, P. & Picard, N. (1992) Strict stationarity of generalized autoregressive processes. Annals of Probability 20, 1714–1730.Google Scholar
Brown, B.M. (1971) Martingale limit theorems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42, 59–66.Google Scholar
Cai, Z. (2007) Trending time-varying coefficient time series models with serially correlated errors. Journal of Econometrics 136, 163–188.Google Scholar
Carroll, R., Fan, J., Gijbels, I., & Wand, M.P. (1997) Generalized partially linear single-index models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 477–489.Google Scholar
Chen, B. & Hong, Y. (2012) Testing for smooth structural changes in time series models via nonparametric regression. Econometrica 80, 1157–1183.Google Scholar
Chu, C.-S. (1995) Detecting parameter shift in GARCH models. Econometric Reviews 14, 241–266.Google Scholar
Cline, D.B.H. & Hart, J.D. (1991) Kernel estimation of densities with discontinuities or discontinuous derivative. Statistics 22, 69–84.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. (1996a) On the Kullback Leibler information divergence of locally stationary processes. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 62, 139–168.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. (1996b) Maximum likelihood estimation and model selection for locally stationary processes. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 6, 171–191.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. (1997) Fitting time series models to nonstationary processes. Annals of Statistics 25, 1–37.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. & Subba Rao, S. (2006) Statistical inference for time-varying ARCH process. Annals of Statistics 34, 1075–1114.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. & Subba Rao, S. (2007) A recursive online algorithm for the estimation of time-varying ARCH parameters. Bernoulli 13, 389–422.Google Scholar
Diebold, F.X. (1986) Modeling the persistence of conditional variances: A comment. Econometric Reviews 5, 51–56.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica 50, 987–1008.Google Scholar
Engle, R. & Gonzalo Rangel, J. (2008) The spline-GARCH model for low-frequency volatility and its global macroeconomic causes. Review of Financial Studies 21, 1187–1222.Google Scholar
Escanciano, J.C. (2009) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of semi-strong GARCH models. Econometric Theory 25, 561–570.Google Scholar
Fan, J. & Huang, T. (2005) Profile likelihood inferences on semiparametric varying-coefficient partially linear models. Bernoulli 11, 1031–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Li, Q., & Min, I. (2006) A nonparametric bootstrap test of conditional distributions. Econometric Theory 22, 587–612.Google Scholar
Francq, C. & Zakoïan, J.M. (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of pure GARCH and ARMA-GARCH. Bernoulli 10, 605–637.Google Scholar
Fryzlewicz, P., Sapatinas, T., & Subba Rao, S. (2008) Normalized least-squares estimation in time-varying ARCH models. Annals of Statistics 36, 742–786.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Wehrly, T.E. (1991) A geometrical method for removing edge effects from kernel-type nonparametric regression estimators. Journal of American Statistical Association 86, 665–672.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. (2001) The new econometrics of structural change: Dating breaks in U.S. labor productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 117–128.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, E. (2005) Neglecting parameter changes in GARCH models. Journal of Econometrics 129, 121–138.Google Scholar
Hjellvik, V., Yao, Q., & Tjøstheim, D. (1998) Linearity testing using local polynomial approximation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 68, 295–321.Google Scholar
Kristensen, D. (2009) On stationarity and ergodicity of the bilinear model with applications to GARCH models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 30, 125–144.Google Scholar
Kulperger, R. & Yu, H. (2005) High moment partial sum processes of residuals in GARCH models and their applications. Annals of Statistics 33, 2395–2422.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, C.G. & Lastrapes, W.D. (1990) Persistence in variance structural change and the GARCH model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8, 225–234.Google Scholar
Lee, O. (2003) A study on GARCH(p,q) process. Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society 18, 541–550.Google Scholar
Lee, S.W. & Hansen, B. (1994) Asymptotic theory for the GARCH(1,1) quasi-maximum likelihood estimator. Econometric Theory 10, 29–52.Google Scholar
Li, F. & Tkacz, G. (2006) A consistent test for conditional density functions with time dependent data. Journal of Econometrics 133, 863–886.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, R.L. (1996) Consistency and asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator in IGARCH(1, 1) and covariance stationary GARCH(1, 1) models. Econometrica 64, 575–596.Google Scholar
Meitz, M. & Saikkonen, P. (2008) Ergodicity, mixing, and existence of moments of a class of Markov models with applications to GARCH and ACD models. Econometric Theory 24, 1291–1320.Google Scholar
Mikosch, T. & Stărică, C. (2004) Nonstationarities in financial time series, the long-range dependence, and the IGARCH effects. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 378–390.Google Scholar
Pettenuzzo, D. & Timmerman, A. (2005) Predictability of Stock Returns and Asset Allocation under Structural Breaks. Working paper, UCSD.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & Hansen, B.E. (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies 57, 99–125.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.M. (1989) Nonparametric estimation of time-varying parameters. In Hackl, P. (ed.), Statistical Analysis and Forecasting of Economic Structural Change, pp. 253–264. Springer.Google Scholar
Schuster, E.F. (1985) Incorporating support constraints into nonparametric estimators of densities. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 14, 1123–1136.Google Scholar
Silverman, B.W. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Speckman, P. (1988) Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B 50, 413–436.Google Scholar
Stout, W. (1974) Almost Sure Convergence. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Subba Rao, S. (2006) On some nonstationary, nonlinear random processes and their stationary approximations. Advances in Applied Probability 38, 1155–1172.Google Scholar
Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. (1987) Local likelihood estimation. Journal of American Statistical Association 82, 559–567.Google Scholar