Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:08:50.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FROM MODEL SELECTION TO MODEL AVERAGING: A COMPARISON FOR NESTED LINEAR MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2025

Wenchao Xu
Affiliation:
Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
Xinyu Zhang*
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
*
Address correspondence to Xinyu Zhang, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; e-mail: xinyu@amss.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Model selection (MS) and model averaging (MA) are two popular approaches when many candidate models exist. Theoretically, the estimation risk of an oracle MA is not larger than that of an oracle MS because the former is more flexible, but a foundational issue is this: Does MA offer a substantial improvement over MS? Recently, seminal work by Peng and Yang (2022) has answered this question under nested models with linear orthonormal series expansion. In the current paper, we further respond to this question under linear nested regression models. A more general nested framework, heteroscedastic and autocorrelated random errors, and sparse coefficients are allowed in the current paper, giving a scenario that is more common in practice. A remarkable implication is that MS can be significantly improved by MA under certain conditions. In addition, we further compare MA techniques with different weight sets. Simulation studies illustrate the theoretical findings in a variety of settings.

Information

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Supplementary material: File

Xu and Zhang supplementary material

Xu and Zhang supplementary material
Download Xu and Zhang supplementary material(File)
File 346.2 KB