Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:59:54.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reputation and adolescent drug use: A focus group study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Peta Odgers,
Stephen Houghton and
John Hattie
Peta Odgers
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Stephen Houghton*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
John Hattie
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
*
Graduate School of Education, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands WA 6009, shoughto@ecel.uwa.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Thirty four high school students were assigned to one of six focus groups according to their self-reported drug status (i.e., user, ex-user, nonuser). Allgroups viewed the same two video vignettes, and a drug user was identified as the target character in the second vignette. At the completion of each vignette they answered a series of questions about the target character in each video. Results indicated that adolescents assign reputations to persons according to the activities in which they engage, and that this assignment is influenced by their own similar or dissimilar activities. An analysis of vocabulary revealed that meaning was context specific to the subculture. In many instances nonusers were unaware of the meaning of the vocabulary used by their drug using peers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , November 1994, pp. 18 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basch, C.E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 14, 411–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basch, C.E., DeCicco, I.M., & Malfetti, J.L. (1989). A focus group study on decision processes of young drivers: Reasons that may support a decision to drink and drive. Health Education Quarterly, 16, 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. (1994, in press). Characterising the goals of juvenile delinquents: Nature, content and purpose. The Journal of Psychology, Crime and Law, 1(3).Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Hattie, J., & Durkin, K. (1994). A comparison of goals, and factors of reputation among young offenders, and at risk and not at risk adolescents. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1983). Moral character. In Weinreich-Haste, H. & Locke, D. (Eds.), Morality in the making: Thought, action and social context (pp. 381–406). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1984). Differential involvement in delinquency : Toward an interpretation in terms of reputation management. In Maher, B.A. & Maher, W.B. (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research, Vol. 13. (pp. 173–239). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 171–193). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J., Arnold, R., & Cerrell, J. (1983). An assessment of the 1982 traffic fatality decrease. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, U.S. Department of Transport.Google Scholar
Heinmann-Ratain, G., Hanson, M., & Peregoy, S.M. (1985). The role of focus groups in designing a smoking prevention program. Journal of School Health, 55, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, N., & Emler, N. (1990). Social network participation and problem behavior in adolescence. In Hurrelmann, R. (Ed.), Health hazards in adolescence (pp. 385–407). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Houghton, S. (1994). Volatile solvent use and reputation enhancement among members of the “Glue Sniffing Gang.” Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Houghton, S., Durkin, K., & Carroll, A. (in press). Children and adolescents’ awareness of the physical and mental health risks associated with tattooing: A focus group study. Adolescence.Google Scholar
Kisker, E.E. (1985). Teenagers talk about sex, pregnancy and contraception. Family Planning Perspectives, 17, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, T, Richards, L., McGalliard, J., and Sharrock, B. (1992). NUDIST 2.3 user manual. Eltham, Victoria: Replea.Google Scholar
Zemke, R., & Kramlinger, T. (1985). Figuring things out. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar