Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:13:26.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2005

SALI TAGLIAMONTE
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H1, Canadasali.tagliamonte@utoronto.cast17@york.ac.uk
JENNIFER SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom, js40@york.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper we analyse variable presence of the complementizer that, i.e. I thinkthat/Øthis is interesting, in a large archive of British dialects. Situating this feature within its historical development and synchronic patterning, we seek to understand the mechanism underlying the choice between that and zero. Our findings reveal that, in contrast to the diachronic record, the zero option is predominant – 91 per cent overall. Statistical analyses of competing factors operating on this feature confirm that grammaticalization processes and grammatical complexity play a role. However, the linguistic characteristics of a previously grammaticalized collocation, I think, exerts a greater effect. Its imprint is visible in multiple internal factors which constrain the zero option in the other contexts. We argue that this recurrent pattern in discourse propels the zero option through the grammar. These findings contribute to research arguing for a strong relationship between frequency and reanalysis in linguistic change.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2005