Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T09:28:29.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the permanence of Scots to the revival of diachrony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Jean-Marc Gachelin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

JEAN-MARC GACHELIN reflects on implications in articles by a Scot and a fellow Frenchman: Tom McArthur's ‘Models of English’ (ET32, Oct 92) and François Chevillet's reply to it, ‘English or Englishes?’ (ET36, Oct 93)

Information

Type
Angles of Vision
Information
English Today , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 51 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Calvet, Jean-Louis. 1975. Pour et contre Saussure. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1973. Sincronía, diacronía e historía. Madrid: Gredos (1st edn, 1958).Google Scholar
Joly, André. 1988. La linguistique génétique. Histoire et théories. Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1971. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: University Press. (1st edn, 1968).Google Scholar
Aitken, A. J. & Tom, McArthur. 1979. Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar
Murison, David. 1977. The Guid Scots Tongue. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood.Google Scholar
Platt, John, Heidi, Weber, & Mian, Lian Ho. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mairi. 1985. The Concise Scots Dictionary. Aberdeen: University Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1982. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck (1st edn, 1959).Google Scholar
Van der, Auwera. 1985. “Relative that – a centennial dispute”. Linguistics 21, pp. 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. Th. 1984. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar