Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T09:13:59.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

i mightn't have had to have been writing this

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2005

michael bulley
Affiliation:
studied classics and linguistics at the universities of edinburgh and london
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

teaching a foreign language can sometimes be like doing linguistics the wrong way round. grammatical study should be based on sentences that have been produced and understood in actual contexts. we should expect to find some imprecise, changeable conventions, but not any rules. it can be difficult, though, to teach a language with that outlook. a learner will be dispirited if you suggest just taking language as it comes and learning from experience. learners want rules, as they seem to offer security and a starting-point. of course, once a teacher has been foolish enough to give a rule, any awkwardly enterprising student can easily find justifiable exceptions to it though, of course, they will not really be exceptions to anything.

Information

Type
original article
Copyright
© 2005 cambridge university press