We partner with a secure submission system to handle manuscript submissions.
Please note:
You will need an account for the submission system, which is separate to your Cambridge Core account. For login and submission support, please visit the
submission and support pages.
Please review this journal's author instructions, particularly the
preparing your materials
page, before submitting your manuscript.
Click Proceed to submission system to continue to our partner's website.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
‘Last week a new word entered the political lexicon: Majorism. Roll it around in your mouth for a while. Get used to it. For the folks from Conservative Central Office have apparently decided that this is to be the buzz word for the long summer campaign. Majorism. Majorism. Majorism.
Further to Denise Murray's report on CmC in ET23 (Jul 90) and Fraida Dubin's account of e-mail in ET 25 (Jan 91), an update on such matters as electronic networks, list servers and on-line academic journals.
GERRY ABBOTT of the School of Education, the University of Manchester, replies to Braj Kachru's article ‘Liberation linguistics and the Quirk Concern’ (ET 25, Jan 91).