Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T18:17:14.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visitor Management in Recreation Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Chi Yung Jim
Chi Yung Jim
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Biogeography and Soil Science, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ever-increasing demands for outdoor recreation have caused widespread ecological damages in many parts of the world, so that methods to contain deleterious impacts and maintain the quality of recreational experience must be earnestly sought. Besides the commonlyprescribed preventive and ameliorative actions on the resource-base, visitor management which can provide cost-effective and long-term solutions deserves more attention than hitherto. This paper evaluates a spectrum of relevant options including the subtle (influencing userbehaviour), through the intermediate (redistributing use), to the regulatory (rationing use).

The reduction of per caput impact can, naturally, raise the capacity of an area to accommodate continuing use. Minimum impact techniques can substantially curtail the largely inadvertent damage due to ignorance rather than malice, while recreational planning and management can take into account the changing user preference. Appropriate data to guide management decisions can be acquired through innovative non-contact approaches, including visitor observation, to solicit candid and spontaneous responses. Good-quality information, conveyed through different channels in ample time before a visit, can effectively modify user behaviour and perception. Formal and informal education, to inculcate a responsible attitude towards the natural environment, can bring long-range benefits. Citizen participation can furnish diversified and useroriented perspectives that are important for successful programmes.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989, pp. 19 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, D.H. & Manfredo, M.J. (1986). Visitor preferences for management actions. Pp. 314–9 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Beardsley, W.G., Herrington, R.B. & Wagar, J.A. (1974). Recreation site management: how to rehabilitate a heavily used campground without stopping visitor use. Journal of Forestry, 73(5), pp. 279–81, illustr.Google Scholar
Beynon, J. (1979). Dutch treats. Town and Country Planning, 48(3), pp. 88–90.Google Scholar
Bukerk, C. (1975). Recreation values of forests and parks. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London, B271, pp. 179–98.Google Scholar
Brown, P.J., McCool, S.F. & Manfredo, M.J. (1987). Evolving concepts and tools for recreation user management in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. Pp. 320–46 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State-of-knowledge, Future Directions (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-220, Ogden, Utah, USA: 369 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Campbell, F.L. (1970). Participant observation in outdoor recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 2(4), pp. 226–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, L.K., Adler, S. & Leonard, R.E. (1979). Factors Affecting Dispersion of Backcountry Campsites. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Experiment Station, Research Note NE-276, Broomall, Pennsylvania, USA: 6 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Christensen, H.H., Williams, P.J. & Clark, R.N. (1987). Values and Choices in Outdoor Recreation by Male and Female Campers in Dispersed Recreation Areas. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Research Paper PNW-377, Portland, Oregon, USA: 20 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.N. & Stankey, G.H. (1979 a). The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum: a Framework for Planning, Management and Research. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Experiment Station, General Technical Report PNW-98, Portland, Oregon, USA: 32 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Clark, R.N. & Stankey, G.H. (1979 b). Determining the acceptability of recreational impacts: an application of the outdoor recreation opportunity spectrum. Pp. 70–81 in Dispersed Recreation and Natural Resource Management: A Symposium (Ed. Shaw, J.). Utah State University, College of Natural Resources, Logan, Utah, USA: 91 pp.. illustr.Google Scholar
Cloke, P.J. & Park, C.C. (1981). Country parks in national parks: a case-study of Craig-y-Nos in the Brecon Beacons, Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 12, pp. 173–85.Google Scholar
Cockrell, D., Detzel, D. & Braun, S.L. (1986). Certified wilderness trip leaders: their knowledge levels, safety records, and opinions of certification courses. Pp. 297–304 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1981). Vegetational changes associated with recreational use and fire suppression in the Eagle Cap Wilderness, Oregon: some management implications. Biological Conservation, 20, pp. 247–70, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1986). Ecological Changes on Campsites in the Eagle Cap Wilderness, 1979 to 1984. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Paper INT-368, Ogden, Utah, USA: 15 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.N. (1987). Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review. Pp. 135–77 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State-of-knowledge, Future Directions (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-220, Ogden, Utah, USA: 369 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. & Benedict, J. (1983). Wilderness campsite selection — what should users be told? Park Science, 3(4), pp. 5–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. & Dalle-Molle, J. (1982). Managing Campfire Impacts in the Backcountry. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-135, Ogden, Utah, USA: 16 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N. & Marion, J.L. (1986). Wilderness campsite impacts: changes over time. Pp. 144–51 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cole, D.N., Petersen, M.E. & Lucas, R.C. (1987). Managing Wilderness Recreation Use: Common Problems and Potential Solutions. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-230, Ogden, Utah, USA: 60 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Countryside Commission (1985). National Countryside Recreation Survey: 1984. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, England, UK: 20 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Cowley, J. & Schreyer, R. (1987). The visitor experience—what do we really mean? Park Science, 7(3), p. 16.Google Scholar
Davilla, B. (1979). Firewood production, use and availability in the high Sierra. Pp. 94–128 in A Report on the Wilderness Impact Study (Eds Stanley, J.T. jun., Harvey, H.T. & Hartesveldt, R.J.). Sierra Club, San Francisco, USA: 290 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Downing, K. & Clark, R.N. (1979). Users' and managers' perceptions of dispersed recreation impacts: a focus on roaded forest lands. Pp. 57–62 in Dispersed Recreation and Natural Resource Management: A Symposium (Ed. Shaw, J.). Utah State University, College of Natural Resources, Logan, Utah, USA: 91 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dravnieks, D. & Pitcher, D. (1982). Public Participation in Resource Planning: Selected Literature Abstracts. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Management Services Staff, Berkeley, California, USA: 77 pp.Google Scholar
Elfring, C. (1986). U.S. parks at a crossroad. BioScience, 36(5), pp. 301–4, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, J.R. & Gilbert, D.L. (1974). Mandatory wilderness permits: some indications of success. Journal of Forestry, 72(12), pp. 753–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1980). The nature of wilderness and education. Pp. 315–22 in Wilderness Management in Australia (Eds Robertson, R.W., Helman, P. & Davey, A.). Proceedings of a Symposium, 07 1978, Canberra College of Advanced Education, Canberra, Australia: 411 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Frissell, S.S. jun., (1978). Judging recreation impacts on wilderness campsites. Journal of Forestry, 76(8), pp. 481–3. illustr.Google Scholar
Frissell, S.S. jun., & Duncan, D.P. (1965). Campsite preference and deterioration in the Quetico-Superior canoe country. Journal of Forestry, 63, pp. 256–60, illustr.Google Scholar
Glyptis, S.A. (1981). People at play in the countryside. Geography, 66, pp. 277–85, illustr.Google Scholar
Graefe, A.R., Kuss, F.R. & Loomis, L. (1986). Visitor impact management in wildland settings. Pp. 432–9 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Grimes, M.D., Pinhey, T.K. & Campos, D.E. (1979). Pay as you play: an analysis of attitudes toward a fee-for-use approach to outdoor recreation. Pp. 1013–9 in Proceedings of the First Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks, Vol. 2 (Ed. Linn, R.M.). (11 1976, New Orleans, Louisiana.) National Park Service Transactions and Proceedings Series No. 5, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA: 1, 325 pp.Google Scholar
Haas, G.E., Driver, B.L., Brown, P.J. & Lucas, R.C. (1987). Wilderness management zoning. Journal of Forestry, 85(12), pp. 17–21, illustr.Google Scholar
Haber, W. (1986). National parks. Pp. 341–53 in Ecology and Design in Landscape (Eds Bradshaw, A.D., Goode, D.A. & Thorp, E.H.P.). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: 463 pp.Google Scholar
Hammitt, W.E. (1982). Alternatives to banning campfires. Parks, 7(3), pp. 8–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Hammitt, W.E., McDonald, C.D. & Hughes, J.L. (1986). Experience level and participation motives of winter wilderness users. Pp. 269–77 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-212. Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harris, C.C. & Driver, B.L. (1987). Recreation user fees, I: Pros and cons. Journal of Forestry, 85(5), pp. 25–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Hendee, J.C. (1974). A scientist's views on some current wilderness management issues. Western Wildlands. Spring 1974, pp. 27–32, illustr.Google Scholar
Hendee, J.C. & Lucas, R.C. (1973). Mandatory wilderness permits: a necessary management tool. Journal of Forestry, 71(4), pp. 206–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H. & Lucas, R.C. (1978). Wilderness Management. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Miscellaneous Publication 1365, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C., USA: 381 pp.. illustr.Google Scholar
Ishii, H. & Shirasaka, S. (1988). Recent studies on recreational geography in Japan. Geographical Review of Japan. 61(Ser. B)(1), pp. 141–9.Google Scholar
IUCN (1967). Analysis of the problems for discussion. Pp. 22–6 in Ecological Impacts of Recreation and Tourism upon Temperate Environments. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland: 287 pp.Google Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1986). The country parks programme and countryside conservation in Hong Kong. The Environmentalist, 6(4), pp. 259–70, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1987 a). Trampling impacts of recreationists on picnic sites in a Hong Kong country park. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), pp. 117–27, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1987 b). Country park usage and visitor impacts in Hong Kong. Parks, 12(1), pp. 3–8, illustr.Google Scholar
Jim, C.Y. (1987 c). Camping impacts on vegetation and soil in a Hong Kong country park. Applied Geography, 7, pp. 317–32, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumpe, E.E. & Brown, P.J. (1982). Redistributing backcpuntry use through information related to recreation experiences. Journal of Forestry, 80(6), pp. 360–2, 364, illustr.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. (1971). Factors Influencing Campground Use in the Superior National Forest of Minnesota. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, Research paper NC-60, St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 18 pp.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. (1974). Locating and designing campgrounds to provide a full range of camping opportunities. Pp. 56–66 in Outdoor Recreation Research: Applying the Results. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, General Technical Report NC-9, St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 98 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. (1976). Principles of recreation carrying capacity. Pp. 1123–34 in Proceedings of the Southern States Recreation Research Applications Workshop. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report SE-9, Asheville, North Carolina, USA: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. (1979). Visitor observation: a tool for appraising interpretive activities. Pp. 49–55 in Proceedings, Workshop Association of Interpretive Naturalists. Association of Interpretative Naturalists, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA: 108 pp.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. & Buchman, R.G. (1974). Putting wilderness permit information to work. Journal of Forestry, 72(10), pp. 622–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Lime, D.W. & Lucas, R.A. (1977). Good information improves the wilderness experience. Naturalist, 28(4), pp. 18–21, illustr.Google Scholar
Loomis, R.J. & Garnard, D. (1986). Trail logs reveal visibility impact on park visitors. Park Science, 6(2), pp. 16–7.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1970). User Evaluation of Campgrounds on Two Michigan National Forests. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, Research paper NC-44, St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 15 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1980). Use Patterns and Visitor Characteristics: Attitudes and Preferences in Nine Wilderness and Other Roadless Areas. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Research paper INT-253, Ogden, Utah, USA: 89 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1981). Redistributing Wilderness Use through Information Supplied to Visitors. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Research paper INT-277, Ogden, Utah, USA: 15 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1982). Recreation regulations—when are they needed? Journal of Forestry, 80(3), pp. 148–51, illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1985 a). The management of recreational visitors in wilderness areas in the United States. Pp. 122–36 in The Ecological Impacts of Outdoor Recreation on Mountain Areas in Europe and North America (Eds Bayfield, N.G. & Barrow, G.C.). Recreation Ecology Research Group, Wye College, Ashford, Kent, England, UK: 210 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1985 b). Visitor Characteristics. Attitudes, and Use Patterns in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. 1970–82. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Intermountain Research Station, Research paper INT-345. Ogden, Utah, USA: 32 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.C. (1986). Influence of visitor experience on wilderness recreation trends. Pp. 261–8 in Proceedings. National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Intermountain Research Station. General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Machlis, G.E. & Neumann, R.P. (1987). The state of national parks in the neotropical realm. Parks, 12(2), pp. 3–8, illustr.Google Scholar
Manning, R.E. (1979). Strategies for managing recreational use of National Parks. Parks, 4(1), pp. 13–5.Google Scholar
Manning, R.E. & Powers, L.A. (1984). Peak and off-peak use: redistributing the outdoor recreation/tourism load. Journal of Travel Research, 23(2), pp. 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B.H. (1986). Hikers' opinions about fees for back-country recreation. Pp. 483–8 in Proceedings. National Wilderness Research Conference: Current Research (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-212, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Merriman, J.A. (1986). Visitor advocate: a novel management strategy. Park Science, 6(2), pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1978). Management Policies. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC., USA: 144 pp.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1987). 1986 National Park Statistical Abstract. Statistical Office, Denver Service Centre, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver, Colorado, USA: 63 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nelson, J.G. (1987). National parks and protected areas, national conservation strategies and sustainable development. Geoforum, 18(3), pp. 291–319, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Loughlin, T. (1987). Minimal impact bushwalking: a way through the wilderness? Australian Ranger Bulletin, 4(1), pp. 38–9.Google Scholar
Parks Canada (1978). The National Parks Zoning System — an Outline. Indian and Northern Affairs, National Parks Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: 9 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J., Stohlgren, T.J. & Fodor, P.A. (1981). Establishing backcountry use quotas: an example from Mineral King, California. Environmental Management, 5(4), pp. 335–40, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patmore, J.A. (1983). Recreation and Resources: Leisure Patterns and Leisure Places. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: 279 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Peterson, G.L. (1983). Rationing and redistribution of recreational use of scarce resources with limited carrying capacity. Pp. 286–302 in Recreation Planning and Management (Eds Lieber, S.R. & Fesenmaier, D.R.). Venture Publishing. State College, Pennsylvania, USA: 393 pp.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1985). Conservation at the crossroads: the countryside. Geographycal Journal, 151(2), pp. 237–45, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, A. (1987). Understanding the user. Australian Ranger Bulletin, 4(2), p. 7.Google Scholar
Reeves, H. (1979). Human waste disposal in the Sierra wilderness. Pp. 129–62 in A Report on the Wilderness Impact Study (Eds Stanley, J.T. jun., Harvey, H.T. & Hartesveldt, R.J.). Sierra Club, San Francisco, USA: 290 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Robertson, R.W. (1980). Public participation: a means of conflict resolution in wilderness management. Pp. 300–14 in Wilderness Management in Australia (Eds Robertson, R.W., Helman, P. & Davey, A.). Proceedings of a Symposium, 07 1978, Canberra College of Advanced Education, Canberra, Australia: 411 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rodgers, H.B. (1980). Policy for survival in Cannock Chase—the Midland Park. Geographical Magazine, 53(1), pp. 29–32, illustr.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, J.W. & Lucas, R.C. (1987). Wilderness use and user characteristics: a state-of-knowledge review. Pp. 204–45 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State-of-knowledge, Future Directions (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT–220, Ogden, Utah, USA: 553 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, J. & Schomaker, J.H. (1982). Research needs for improved recreation visitor management. Pp. 1–6 in Forest and River Recreation: Research Update (Technical Coordinator D.W. Lime). University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Publication 18, St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 121 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Roome, N.J. (1982). The use of national nature reserves by access permit holders. Journal of Environmental Management, 14, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
Schreiner, E. (1978). The Effects of Campfire Building Activities on Vegetation and Soils. Olympic National Park, Resource Management Information Note ONP-1, Port Angeles, Washington, USA: 5 pp.Google Scholar
Shafer, E.L. jun., (1969). The Average Camper who Doesn't Exist. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Experiment Station, Research paper NE-142, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, USA: 27 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Simmons, I.G. (1972). Japanese playgrounds. Geography, 45, pp. 569–74.Google Scholar
Smith, S.L. (1983). Recreation Geography. Longman, London, England, UK: 220 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Snyder, A.P. (1966). Wilderness management—a growing challenge. Journal of Forestry, 64(7), pp. 441–6.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. (1974). Criteria for the determination of recreational carrying capacity in the Colorado River Basin. Pp. 83–101 in Environmental Management in the Colorado River Basin (Eds Crawford, A.B. & Peterson, D.F.). Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, USA: 172 pp.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. (1979 a). Management options for limiting use. Paper presented at the National Recreation and Park Association Annual Meeting, 10 1979, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: 10 pp. (mimeogr.)Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. (1979 b). Use rationing in two southern California wildernesses. Journal of Forestry, 77(6), pp. 347–9.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. (1980). What have we learned: a symposium summary. Pp. 88–91 in Dispersed Recreation and Resource Management: a Symposium (Ed. Shaw, J.). College of Natural Resources. Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA: 91 pp.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H. (1982). The role of management in wilderness and natural-area preservation. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 149–55. illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankey, G.H. & Baden, J. (1977). Rationing Wilderness Use: Methods, Problems, and Guidelines. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Research paper INT-192. Ogden, Utah, USA: 20 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankey, G.H. & McCool, S.F. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: evolution, appraisal, and application. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), pp. 453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankey, G.H. & Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behavior: a state-of-knowledge review. Pp. 246–93 in Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State-of-knowledge, Future Directions (Compiler R.C. Lucas). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-220, Ogden, Utah, USA: 369 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Stankey, G.H., Lucas, R.C. & Lime, D.W. (1976). Crowding in parks and wilderness. Design and Environment, 7(3), pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
Stynes, D.J. (1982). The role of information in recreation site selection. Pp. 100–4 in Forest and River Recreation: Research Update: Symposium Selected Papers (Technical Coordinator D.W. Lime). University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Publication 18–1982, St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 121 pp.Google Scholar
Temple, K.K., Camper, A.K. & Lucas, R.C. (1982). Potential health hazard from human wastes in wilderness. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 37(6), pp. 357–9.Google Scholar
Walshe, P. (1978). Country parks: the first decade. Landscape Design, 124, pp. 13–6.Google Scholar
Washburne, R.F. & Cole, D.N. (1983). Problems and Practices in Wilderness Management: A Survey of Managers. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Experiment Station, Research paper INT-304, Ogden, Utah, USA: 56 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. & Waterman, G. (1987). Communicating with the picnicking public. Australian Ranger Bulletin, 4(2), p. 10.Google Scholar