Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:21:12.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Attempt to Predict Which Amazonian Tree Species May be Threatened by Logging Activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Adriana M. Z. Martini,
Nelson de A. Rosa and
Christopher Uhl
Adriana M. Z. Martini
Affiliation:
Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (IMAZON), Caixa Postal 1015, Belém, 66.000 Pará, Brazil
Nelson de A. Rosa
Affiliation:
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi (MPEG), Estrada Perimetral, Belém, Pará, Brazil
Christopher Uhl
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA, and Technical Advisor, Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (IMAZON), Caixa Postal 1015, Belém, 66.000 Pará, Brazil
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The impacts of logging on Amazonian ecosystems has been the focus of considerable attention both within and outside of Amazonia. However, the impacts of logging on individual timber species has not been at all adequately investigated. Logging affects timber species by: (1) removing mature individuals that are important sources of seeds; (2) damaging seedlings and saplings (i.e future generations of canopy adults); and (3) creating conditions that favour fire by opening the canopy and leaving slash as fuel on the forest floor.

In this study we summarize information on the ecological characteristics of 305 timber species in Brazilian Amazonia. We identify seven ecological parameters that are useful in evaluating a species' ability to resist the negative impacts of logging. These characteristics are: (1) effective long-distance dispersal ability; (2) abundance of saplings in forest regeneration; (3) rapid growth; (4) ability to resprout; (5) capacity to withstand fire; (6) broad geographic distribution; and (7) high density of adults. We hypothesize thai species with characteristics opposed to these parameters and subjected to intense logging pressure will have difficulty in maintaining their populations in logging regions.

We use a simple scoring system to rank species with regard to their hypothesized ability to withstand logging impacts. Among the species that are potentially susceptible to logging impacts are Euxylophora paraensis (‘Pau Amarelo’) and Swietenia macrophylla (American Mahogany). The sawn lumber from these two species goes principally to European and North American buyers, revealing a direct link between First World consumption and possible biodiversity impoverishment in the Brazilian rain-forest. These two species, and others that might experience population reductions as a result of logging, merit special study.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , Summer 1994, pp. 152 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chichignoud, M., Déon, G., Détienne, P., Parant, B. & Vantomme, P. (1990). Atlas de Maderas Tropicales de America Latina. (Organization Internacional de las Maderas Tropicales e Centre Technique Forestier Tropical.) F. Paillart, Abbeville, France: 218 pp.Google Scholar
IBDF (Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal) (1981). Madeiras da Amazonia-Caracteristicas e Utilizaçao. Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. IBDF, Brasilia, Brazil: Vol. 1 [not available for checking].Google Scholar
IBDF (Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal) (1983). Potencial Madeireiro do Grande Carajás. IBDF, Brasilia, Brazil: 134 pp.Google Scholar
IBDF (Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal) (1986). Listagem no 1. Nomenclatura Comercial de Madeiras Amazônicas (continuaçao). INFoc Madeireiro, 40, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
IBDF (Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal) (1988). Madeiras da Amazonia-Caracteristicas e Utilizaçao. Estaçao Experimental de Curua-Una, IBDF, Brasilia, Brazil, Vol. 2 [not available for checking].Google Scholar
IMAZON (MS). [Unpublished report.] Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazonia. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Johns, A.D. (1992). Species conservation in managed tropical forests. Pp. 15–55 in Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction (Eds Whitmore, T.C. & Sayer, J.A.). Chapman & Hall, London, England, UK: 153 pp.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D., Uhl, C. & Serrao, E.A.S. (1991). Recuperation of a degraded Amazonian landscape: forest recovery and agricultural restoration. Ambio, 20, pp. 248–55, illustr.Google Scholar
Primack, R.B. & Hall, P. (1991). Species diversity research in Bornean forests with implications for conservation biology and silviculture. Tropics, 1, pp. 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primack, R.B. & Hall, P. (1992). Biodiversity and forest change in Malaysian Borneo. BioScience, 42, pp. 829–37, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, J.M. (1985). Forestry in the Brazilian Amazon. Pp. 369–92 in Amazonia, Key Environment Series (Eds Prance, G.T. & Lovejoy, T.E.). Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, UK: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Rodan, B.D., Newton, A.C. & Verissimo, A. (1992). Mahogany conservation: status and policy initiatives. Environmental Conservation, 19, pp. 331–8, 4 figs and table.Google Scholar
Rylands, A.B. (1990). Um mapa que protege a Amazonia. Ciencia Hoje, 11, pp. 6–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Silva, J.N.M. (1989). The Behaviour of the Tropical Rain Forest of the Brazilian Amazon after Logging. D. Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK: 303 pp.Google Scholar
SUDAM (Superintendencia de Desenvolvimento da Amazonia) (1981). Grupamento de Espécies Tropicais da Amazonia por Similaridade de Caracteristicas Basicas e por Utilização. Belém, Pará, Brazil: 237 pp.Google Scholar
Uhl, C. & Kauffman, J.B. (1990). Deforestation effects on fire susceptibility and the potential response of tree species to fire in the rainforest of the eastern Amazon. Ecology, 71, pp. 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl, C., Verissimo, A., Mattos, M., Brandino, Z. & Vieira, I.C. Guimaraes (1991). Social, economic, and ecological consequences of selective logging in an Amazon frontier: the case of Tailândia. Forest Ecology and Management, 46, pp. 243–73.Google Scholar
Verissimo, A., Barreto, P., Mattos, M., Tarifa, R. & Uhl, C. (1992). Logging impacts and prospects for sustainable forest management in an old Amazonian frontier: the case of Paragominas. Forest Ecology and Management, 55, pp. 169–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar