Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:11:57.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Banking Responsibility and Liability for the Environment: What Are Banks Doing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Antony L.T. McCammon
Antony L.T. McCammon
Affiliation:
Cater Allen Bank (Jersey) Limited, Minervastrasse 117, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

No-strings-attached lending is anathema to the serious commercial banker, who sees only a wafer-thin line between such ‘lending’ and the un-bank-like practice of giving (non-returnable) grants. Such doubts, indeed, are not confined to the banking industry. In the face of home grown problems of unemployment or health-care, for instance, democratically elected governments of donor countries are finding themselves under increasing pressure from their voters to cut back on bilateral assistance to hopelessly indebted taker-states. Multilateral lending and development institutions are facing an uncertain future, trapped in the vicious circle of bad debts that are all-too-steadily increasing, capital and funding quotas that are failing to materialize (eyes are currently on the US Congress), and borrowing that is becoming ever-more expensive. The African Development Bank is faltering; a Middle East Development Bank is in danger of being stillborn. The World Bank has recently been trying bravely to redress the balance: it has created a ‘multilateral debt facility’ for the most severely-indebted countries, and devised a numerical scale of national well-being that is more appropriate for the measurement of ecologically sustainable development than GNP per head of population. While these initiatives should not be belittled, good ideas are too often murdered by gangs of ugly facts.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , Winter 1995, pp. 297 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Bankers Association (1991). Statement: Lender Liability under Superfund. Survey by the New Jersey Bankers Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
Banker, The (London) (1994). Issue of 12, p. 66.Google Scholar
Banker, The (London) (1995). Issue of 07, pp. 135–207.Google Scholar
CSFI (1995). An Environmental Risk Rating for Scottish Nuclear. Available from CSFI, 18 Curzon Street, London W1Y 7AD, England, UK: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
EPA (1992). Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). Environment Protection Agency: Vol. 57, Nr 83, Part XI, 57 FR 18344, 29. 1992.Google Scholar
Financial Times (1995). Issue of 30 08, p. 3.Google Scholar
Financial Times Environmental Liability Report (FT ELR) (London) (1993 a). Issue 001 of September, p. 16.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1993 b). Issue 002 of October, p. 17.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 a). Issue 006 of February, p. 18.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 b). Issue 008 of April, p. 18.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 c). Issue 009 of May, p. 16.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 d). Issue 011 of July, p. 18.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 e). Issue 014 of October, p. 3.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 f). Issue 015 of November, pp. 16–7.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1994 g). Issue 016 of December, pp. 15–7.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1995 a). Issue 017 of January, pp. 16–7.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1995 b). Issue 020 of April, pp. 15–8.Google Scholar
FT ELR (1995 c). Issue 022 of June, p. 16.Google Scholar
GHK International Ltd (1994). Environmental Training for Bankers in Central and Eastern Europe — Task 1: Report of Survey, Spring 1994. Available from GHK International Ltd., 30 St Paul's Square, Birmingham B3 1QZ, England, UK: 57 pp., 5 appendixes.Google Scholar
Goodland, R.J.A. (1992). Environmental priorities for financial institutions. Environmental Conservation, 19(1), pp. 9–21, 5 tables and 10 annexes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S.M. (1992). Umweltorientierte Unternehmensstragien — Ansätze in Grossbanken: Kapitel 6 Grossbanken und Umwelt. Hochschule St Gallen, Switzerland: pp. 327–79.Google Scholar
McCammon, A.L.T. (1994). Environment and development: key role for banks? Environmental Conservation, 21(4), pp. 291–3.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. & SirBurnett, J. (1993). Surviving With The Biosphere: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Future… Edinburgh University Press, 22 George Square, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: xxii + 572 pp., illustr., appendixes & indexes.Google Scholar
Russia (1993). State of Environment of The Russian Federation 1993 National Report. Ministry for Environment Protection and Natural Resources of The Russian Federation: Translation, Image Publishing House, Moscow, Russia, 1994: p. 251: [volume not available for checking].Google Scholar
UNCED (1993). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992. United Nations, New York, NY, USA: Volume I Resolutions Adopted by the Conference. Annex II Agenda 21.33.13, p. 414.Google Scholar
UNEP (1995). UNEP Global Survey: Environmental Policies and Practices of the Financial Services Sector January 1995. United Nations, New York, NY, USA: 12 pp., 4 appendixes.Google Scholar
USA (1992). United States of America National Report [to] UNCED 1992. Washington, DC, USA: 372 pp.Google Scholar
Wilde Sapte (1991). Lenders' Liability for Environmental Damage. Available from Wilde Sapte, Queensbridge House, 60 Upper Thames Street, London EC4V 3BD, England, UK: 10 pp. (typescript).Google Scholar