Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:32:52.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Converting Industry to Environmental Impact Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John B. Elkington
John B. Elkington
Affiliation:
Managing Director, Environmental Data Services Limited, Orchard House, 14 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BU, United Kingdom; Editor of ENDS Report.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Successive inquiries into the problems associated with population, growth, resources, and environment, have stressed the need for new environmental management policies and techniques. Environmental impact assessment, whose evolution is briefly described in this paper, will be a vital ingredient in any transition to an environmentally sustainable world order.

There is a substantial and growing literature on the use of environmental impact assessment methods, although relatively little has been written on the increasing use of such methods by industry in some countries— often without any direct compulsion by Government. A range of examples of the industrial use of environmental impact assessment are reviewed, and the conclusion is drawn that properly designed methods can help industry to meet its own basic objectives of survival, profit, and growth.

While there are considerable problems associated with the prediction of ecological and other environmental effects, particularly where the baseline data are inadequate or non-existent, the experience of a growing number of companies and other industrial organizations does suggest that environmental impact assessment is increasingly recognized as an indispensable management tool in those industries which are likely to meet environmental resistance in their development planning operations.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 1981 , pp. 23 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

BP (1980). Magnus Oilfield Environmental Assessment. BP Environmental Control Centre, London, UK: 62 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brandt Commission (1980). North-South: A Programme for Survival. The Report of the Independent Commission on International Development. Pan Books, London, UK: 304 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, B. D., Bisset, R. & Wathern, P. (1980). Environmental Impact Assessment: A Bibliography with Abstracts. Mansell (London) and Bowker (New York): vi + 516 pp.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Economic Communities (cited as EEC) (1980). Proposal for a Council Directive Concerning the Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects. Document reference COM (80) 313 final, submitted to the Council of Ministers in June: 32 pp.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality [and Us Department of State] (1980). The Global 2000 Report to the President: Entering the Twenty-first Century. 3 vols. Summary volume, U.S. Government Printing Office, reference 1980 0–274–484: 46 pp.Google Scholar
Cowell, E. B. (1978). Ecological monitoring as a management tool in industry. Ocean Management, No. 4, pp. 273–85.Google Scholar
Dean, F. E. (1980). EIA and the cost of industrial development: the use of EIA by the British gas industry. Pp. 34–49 in Elkington (1980c) q.v.Google Scholar
Dean, F. E. & Graham, G. (1977). Environmental impact analysis in the British gas industry. Economic Commission for Europe Symposium on the Gas Industry and Environment. Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Minsk, 20–27 June. Pp. 151–77 in The Gas Industry and the Environment, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK: vi + 263 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (1976). Assessment of Major Industrial Applications—A Manual. Research Report 13: xiv + 170 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
EEC—see Commission of the European Economic Communities.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. (1977). The impact of development projects on estuarine and other wetland ecosystems. Environmental Conservation, 4(2), pp. 135–44, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkington, J. B. (1980 a). The environmental pressure. Management Today, 01, pp. 62–65, 120, 123, 126, illustr.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. (1980 b). The Ecology of Tomorrow's World: Industry's Environment. Associated Business Press, London, UK: xii + 311 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. (1980 c). Environmental Impact Assessment. OYEZ Intelligence Report, OYEZ Publishing Limited, London, UK: 96 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. & Roberts, J. A. (1977 a). Who needs ecologists? New Scientist, 27 10, pp. 210–12.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. & Roberts, J. A. (1977 b). Is there an ecologist in the house? New Scientist, 3 11, pp. 276–8.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. B. & Roberts, J. A. (1977 c). The ecology of tomorrow's world. New Scientist, 17 11, pp. 411–3.Google Scholar
Ends Report (1979 a). An EEC data mountain by 1984? ENDS Report 36, 10, pp. 8–11, illustr.Google Scholar
Ends Report (1979 b). The British Gas Corporation: EIA and the cost of industrial development. ENDS Report 34, 09, pp. 8–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Ends Report (1980 a). Does environmental impact analysis work? ENDS Report 43, 02, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Ends Report (1980 b). Environmental quality: the industrial dimension. ENDS Report 51, 06, pp. 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Environment and Development (cited as IIED) (1978). Banking on the Biosphere (A Study of the Environmental Procedures and Practices of Nine Development Financing Agencies). D. C. Heath, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts: xv + 203 pp.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (cited as IUCN) (1980). The World Conservation Strategy. Main report, Gland 1196, Switzerland: 50 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
‘Komarov, B.’ (1980). The Destruction of Nature in the Soviet Union. Pluto Press, London, UK: 150 pp.Google Scholar
Land Use Consultants (1978). Environmental Appraisal of Four Alternative Water Resources Schemes: Report for the North West Water Authority. Land Use Consultants, London, UK: 188 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Land Use Consultants (1979 a). Environmental Assessment: Proposed Abstraction at Wastwater: Report for British Nuclear Fuels. Land Use Consultants, London, UK: 96 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Land Use Consultants (1979 b). Report on Consultations: Report to the North West Water Authority. Land Use Consultants, London, UK: 84 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Larminie, G. (1980). The use of EIA and of environmental audits in the oil industry. Pp. 50–9 in Elkington (1980 c) q.v.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (cited as OECD) (1980). Environment Policies for the 1980s. OECD, Paris, France: 110 pp.Google Scholar
Pechey, R. (1980). Stand up and speak. Chemical Age, 02, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
Sullom Voe Environmental Advisory Group (1976). Oil Terminal at Sullom Voe: Environmental Impact Assessment. Thule Press, Shetlands, UK: 133 pp.+ 13 maps.Google Scholar
UNEP—see United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
Union Des Industries de la Communaute Europeenne (cited as UNICE) (1978). Working Document on Environmental Impact Assessment, 11 05. Department of Industrial Development, UNICE, Bruxelles, Belgium: 7 pp.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (cited as UNEP) (1980). Guidelines for Assessing Industrial Environmental Impact and Environmental Vetting for the Siting of Industry. UNEP Industry and Environment Office, Paris, France, in association with Atkins Research and Development: 120 pp.Google Scholar
Wandesforde-Smith, G. (1978). Environmental Impact Assessment in the European Communities. Diskussionpapier, Internationales Institut für Umwelt und Gesellschaft, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin: 52 pp.Google Scholar