Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:39:01.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts from Mosquito Control-induced Sulphur Mobilization in a Cape Cod Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Michael A. Soukup and
John W. Portnoy
Michael A. Soukup
Affiliation:
Office of Scientific Studies, North Atlantic Regional Office, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 15 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, USA.
John W. Portnoy
Affiliation:
Office of Scientific Studies, North Atlantic Regional Office, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 15 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, USA.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Insect control programmes sometimes include environmental modification techniques such as diking and drainage. The impacts of such techniques are not often known or assessed. As a telling example having wide implications, we present an analysis of impacts in a small estuary which has been subjected to both diking and ditching—primarily for mosquito control.

The major impacts stem from katteklei formation. Desiccated salt-marsh sediments produce acidified leachates which result from oxidation of pyrites. Lowered pH and high (acid-mobilized) aluminium concentrations both surpass levels that are known to be toxic to aquatic fauna. Fish and invertebrate communities in the basin are impoverished, and important commercial species such as American Eels and Alewives are heavily decimated. The acid-tolerant mosquito Aedes cantator thrives, however. Thus a natural system of substantial economic and aesthetic value has been inadvertently devastated through application of unnecessarily harsh as well as, in this case, ineffective mosquito control methods. Their use should be re-evaluated for similar impacts wherever such application has been carried out or is being contemplated.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Spring 1986, pp. 47 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alabaster, J.S. & Lloyd, R. (1982). Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Fish (2nd edn). Butterworth Scientific, London, England, UK: xi + 361 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Berner, R.A. (1970). Sedimentary pyrite formation. Am. J. Sci., 268, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, D.V. & Ford, H.W. (1973). Chemical properties of acidsulfate soils recently reclaimed from Florida marshland. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 37, pp. 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiber, F.C. (1974). Salt marsh plants and future coastal salt marshes in relation to animals. Pp. 475–508 in Ecology of Halophytes (Eds Reimold, R.J. & Queen, W.H.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xiv + 605 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiber, F.C. (1982). Animals of the Tidal Marsh. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA: x + 422 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
DeSista, R.J. & Newling, C.J. (1979). A Review of Mosquito Control Operations in Massachusetts Wetlands. Regulatory Branch, New England Division, US Army Corps of Engineers: 45 pp.Google Scholar
Driscoll, C.T. Jr, Baker, J.P., Bisogni, J.J. Jr, & Schofield, C.L. (1980). Effect of aluminium speciation on fish in dilute acidified waters. Nature (London) 284, pp. 161–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, C.H. & Staveren, J.M. Van (1958). Marsh soils in the United States and in the Netherlands. J. Soil & Water Conserv., 13, pp. 15–7.Google Scholar
Fromm, P.O. (1980). A review of some physiological and toxicological responses of freshwater fish to acid stress. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 5, pp. 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, L.M. & Baker, S.J. (1980). Acidity fluctuations at a broadland site in Norfolk. J. Applied Ecol., 17, pp. 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hem, J.D. (1968). Graphical Methods for Studies of Aqueous Aluminum Hydroxide, Fluoride, and Sulfate Complexes. U.S. Geological Survey, Supply Paper 1827–B, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Howarth, R.W. & Teal, J.M. (1979). Sulfate reduction in a New England salt marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr., 24, pp. 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, R.W. & Merkel, S. (1982). Pyrite formation and the measurement of sulfate reduction in salt marsh sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, pp. 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, G.W., Giblin, A., Howarth, E.R.W. & Ryans, R.A.(1982). Pyrite and oxidized iron mineral phases in salt marsh and estuarine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 46, pp. 2665–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, W. W. (1958). Irreversible drainage—a new factor in waterfowl management. Trans. N. Amer. Wildlife Conf., 23, pp. 342–8.Google Scholar
Portnoy, J.W. (in press). Saltmarsh diking and nuisance mosquito production on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Mosq. News.Google Scholar
Portnoy, J.W. & Soukup, M.A. (1982). From salt marsh to forest: the outer Cape's wetlands. The Cape Naturalist, 2, pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
Stumm, W. & Morgan, J.J. (1981). Aquatic Chemistry (2nd edn), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: xiv + 780 pp., illustr.Google Scholar