Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T13:24:33.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvements in Policy Planning for Resource Recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Glenn R. Harris
Glenn R. Harris
Affiliation:
Assistant Director, Environmental Studies Program, St Lawrence University, Canton, New York 13617, USA.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Global shortages of raw materials and growing problems of solid-waste management have made resource recovery a pressing concern of public policy for many governments. The purpose of this paper is to review policy planning for resource recovery. Planning in this as well as related arenas appears to suffer from several interrelated difficulties. One difficulty of public-policy planning is the inaccurate modelling in policy analysis; another is the common resistance to uniform implementation guidelines. Both of these difficulties appear to hinge on the problem of behavioural change.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 1979, pp. 117 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berry, D. E. (1974). The transfer of planning theories to health planning practice. Policy Sciences, 5, pp. 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braybrooke, D. & Lindblom, C. E. (1963). A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.: ix + 268 pp.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H. & Flinn, W. L. (1978). Social class and mass environmental beliefs: A reconsideration, Environ. Behav., 10, pp. 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, P. A. & Christenson, J. A. (1972). The public value of pollution control. Pp. 237–56 in Social Behavior, Natural Resources and The Environment (Ed. Burch, W. R., Cheek, N. H. & Taylor, L.). Harper & Row, New York, N.Y.: x + 374 pp.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. & Heffernan, B. (1975). Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: An empirical examination. Rural Social., 40, pp. 18–29.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. & Liere, K. D. Van (1978). The ‘new environmental paradigm’: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J. Environ. Educ., 9 (4), pp. 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Anchor Press-Doubleday, Garden City, N.J.: xx + 289 pp.Google Scholar
Friedmann, J. & Abonyi, G. (1976). Social learning: A model for policy research. Environ. Plan. A, 8, pp. 927–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, J. & Hudson, B. (1974). Knowledge and action: A guide to planning theory. AIP Journal, 40, pp. 2–16.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, R. S. (1975). Learning in government programs and the usefulness of cost-benefit analysis: Lessons from manpower and urban renewal history. Policy Sci., 6, pp. 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, K. R. & Adelman, L. (1976). Science, values, and human judgement. Science, 194, pp. 389–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. R., Humphrey, C. B., Jewell, T. & Mann, S. H. (1976). A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Waste Paper Recovery in the Capitol Complex of Office Buildings in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Center for the Study of Environmental Policy, University Park, Pennsylvania: vii + 106 pp.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. R., Harris, G. R. & Mann, S. H. (1978). Sociological aspects of wastepaper recovery. J. Environ. Syst., 8, pp. 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, C. R., Mann, S. H. & Harris, G. R. (1977). A multidisciplinary assessment of waste paper recovery from an institutional source. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 11, pp. 101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Admin. Rev., xix, pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, R. A., Loube, M. & Smith, F. A. (1974). Energy Conservation Through Improved Solid Waste Management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: 39 pp.Google Scholar
McEvoy, J. (1972). The American concern with environment. Pp. 214–36 in Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment. (Ed. Burch, W. R., Cheek, N. H. & Taylor, L.). Harper & Row, New York, N.Y.: x + 374 pp.Google Scholar
McGowan, E. F. (1976). Rational fantasies. Policy Sciences, 7, pp. 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S. H. & Humphrey, C. R. (1974). The Feasibility of Paper Recycling at the Pennsylvania State University: A Cost/Effectiveness Analysis. Institute for Research on Land and Water Resources, University Park, Pennsylvania: v + 82 pp.Google Scholar
Mar, B. W. (1974). Problems encountered in multidisciplinary resources and environmental simulation models development. J. Environ. Manage., 2, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
Midwest Research Institute (1975). Base Line Forecasts of Resource Recovery, 1972 to 1990. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: 376 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. (1978). The public speaks again: A new environmental survey. Resources, 60, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Nash, C., Pearce, D. & Stanley, J. (1975). Criteria for evaluating project evaluation techniques. AIP Journal, 41, pp. 83–9.Google Scholar
Orlans, H. (1975). Neutrality and advocacy in policy research. Policy Sci., 6, pp. 107–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinovitz, F., Pressman, J. & Rein, M. (1976). Guidelines: A plethora of forms, authors, and functions. Policy Sci., 7, pp. 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridker, R. G. (1972). The economy, resource requirements, and pollution levels. Pp. 35–7 in Population, Resources, and the Environment. U.S. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, Washington, D. C.: 377 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Soucie, G. (1973). Solid waste: The new apocalypse. Audubon, 75, pp. 115–30.Google Scholar
Strauch, R. E. (1975). ‘Squishy’ problems and quantitative methods. Policy Sci., 6, pp. 175–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of the Interior (1973). Mining and Minerals Policy, 1973. Washington, D.C.: 73 pp.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Solid Waste Management Programs (1974). Second Report to Congress: Resource Recovery and Source Reduction. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: xiv + 112 pp.Google Scholar