Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T12:17:40.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land-building and Stabilization by Mangroves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Jedfrey M. Carlton
Jedfrey M. Carlton
Affiliation:
Marine Biologist, Marine Research Laboratory, Florida Department of Natural Resources, 100 Eighth Avenue, S.E., St Petersburg, Florida 33701, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Covering broad areas of tropical shorelines are unique plants known as mangroves, which exhibit several structural and physiological modifications to the saline environment—especially in their root systems. Prop-roots and pneumatophores, two obvious modifications, allow mangroves to play a role in coastal geomorphology, either as land-builders or as stabilizers of substrates derived from classical sedimentation processes.

Current data show that: (1) Provided with proper substrates, mangrove seedlings can be raised in the laboratory for later planting in the field, although on exposed beaches success ratios may be low. (2) Larger mangrove plants (1.0–5.0 m in height) may be transplanted with relative ease and appear to succeed with few or no mortalities resulting from the techniques used. (3) Pruning of mangroves appears to be a successful method of mangrove control, allowing their utilization for stabilization around housing developments. (4) Fossil evidence for mangroves as shoreline developers is suggested by the discovery of a fossil mangrove reef off the Miami, Florida, coast. However, submergence of near-by mangrove areas has occurred, as evidenced by sea-grass beds growing above buried peat in the bay bottom. (5) Black Mangroves may be more useful than Red Mangroves as shoreline stabilizers due to their cold-hardiness, ability to tolerate disturbed substrates, and rapid production of pneumatophores. (6) Insect and isopod damage to mangroves has been documented, and it has been suggested by several research workers that such damage may lead to increased erosion of coastlines in many areas of southern and central Florida. In addition, boring activities in Red Mangrove seedlings may result in decreased numbers of seedlings being available for new mangrove growth and colonization. (7) Mangroves have been suggested for use as stabilizers of substrates in conjunction with planned filling and sea wall construction.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , Winter 1974 , pp. 285 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Auld, A. H., Barrineau, K. T., Berrigan, M. E. & Schweiger, N. (1974). Occurrence and ecological implications of the wood-boring isopod Sphaeroma [destructor] in a tidal mangrove swamp. Assn South eastern Biologists Bull., 21(2), p. 36 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Autry, A. S., Stewart, V., Fox, M. & Hamilton, W. (1973). Progress report: mangrove planting for stabilization of developing shorelines. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci., 36(Suppl. to No. 1), p. 17 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Banijbatana, D. (1958). Mangrove forests in Thailand. Pp. 22–34 in Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Science Congress, Bangkok, 1957, Vol. 11, Forest Resources, 71 pp.Google Scholar
Beard, J. S. (1944). Climax vegetation in tropical America. Ecology, 25, pp. 127–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, H. H. M. (1917). Ecology and physiology of the Red Mangrove. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., 56, pp. 589–672.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (1959). Mangrove succession and coastal change in south-west Malaya. Trans. Inst. Brit. Geogrs, 26, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J. (1938). Coastal movement and the devel opment of some New England salt-marshes. Proc. Geol. Assn., 49, pp. 378–84.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J. (1944 a). 1939 Cambridge University Expedition to Jamaica. I. A study of the botanical processes concerned in the development of the Jamaican shoreline. J. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.), 52, pp. 407–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, V. J. (1944 b). 1939 Cambridge University Expedition to Jamaica. II. A study of the environment of Avicennia nitida Jacq. in Jamaica. J. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.), 52, pp. 448–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, V. J. (1944 c). 1939 Cambridge University Expedition to Jamaica. III. The morphology of Avicennia nitida Jacq., and the function of its pneuma tophores. J. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.), 52, pp. 487–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, V. J. & Ronaldson, J. W. (1958). The mangrove and salt-marsh flats of the Auckland isthmus. N. Z. Dept Sci. Ind. Res. Bull., 125, 79 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Craighead, F. C. (1964). Land, mangroves, and hurricanes. Fairchild Trop. Gard. Bull., 19(4), pp. 5–32.Google Scholar
Craighead, F. C. (1969). Vegetation and recent sedi mentation in Everglades National Park. Fla. Naturalist, 42(4), pp. 157–66.Google Scholar
Craighead, F. C. (1971). The Trees of South Florida. I. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida: xvi + 212 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Curtis, A. H. (1888). How the mangroves form islands. Garden & Forest, 1, p. 100.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (1938). Mangroves, makers of land. Nature Mag., 31, pp. 551–3.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (1939). The role of mangrove vegetation in land-building in southern Florida. Am. Phil. Soc. Yearb. 1938, pp. 162–4.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (1940 a). The ecology and geologic role of mangroves in Florida. Carnegie Inst., Washington Pub. 517, Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, 32(16), pp. 307–409, illustr.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (1940 b). The peat deposits of Florida—their occurrence, development, and uses. Fla. Geol. Survey Bull., 30, 247 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dawes, C. J. (1967). Marine Algae in the vicinity of Tampa Bay, Florida. Contrib. Dept Bot. & Bact., Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, No. 27, 105 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Egler, F. E. (1952). South-east saline Everglades vegetation, Florida, and its management. Veg. Acta Geobot., 3, pp. 225–63.Google Scholar
Estevez, E. (1974). Systematics and ecology of Sphaeroma Latreille in Florida. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci., 37 (Suppl. to No.1), p. 9 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gifford, J. C. (1934). The Keys and Glades of South Florida. Books Inc., New York & Bostone: 193 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gill, A. M. (1969). Tidal trees: orient and Occident. Fairchild Trop. Gard. Bull., 24(3), pp. 7–10, illustr.Google Scholar
Gill, A. M. (1970). The mangrove fringe on the eastern Pacific. Fairchild Trop. Gard. Bull., 25(3), pp. 7–11, illustr.Google Scholar
Gill, A. M. (1971). Mangroves—is the tide of public opinion turning? Fairchild Trop. Gard. Bull., 26(2), pp. 5–9, illustr.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D. W. & Lowenstam, H. A. (1958). The influence of marine bottom communities on the developmental environment of sediments. J. Geol., 66(3), pp. 310–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, P. J. (1972). Holocene Sedimentation in the Everglades and Saline Tidal Lands. Fieldtrip Guide book, Am. Quaternary Cong., 2nd National Meeting, Miami, Florida, 2–3 December 1972, 47 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Graham, S. A. (1964). The genera of Rhizophoraceae and Combretaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor., 45(3), pp. 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, R. M. (1927). Natural resources of southern Florida. Pp. 27–206 in Eighteenth Ann. Rept, Fla. Geol. Survey, Tallahassee: 207 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harshberger, J. W. (1914). The vegetation of south Florida south of 27° 30´ North, exclusive of the Florida Keys. Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci., Phila., 7, pp. 511–89.Google Scholar
Heald, E. J. (1971). The production of organic detritus in a south Florida estuary. Univ. of Miami Sea Grant Bull., 6, 110 pp.Google Scholar
Heald, E. J. & Odum, W. E. (1969). The contribution of mangrove swamps to Florida fisheries. Proc. Gulf & Caribb. Fish. Inst., 22nd Ann. Session, pp. 130–5.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, J. E. & Multer, H. G. (1965). Fossil mangrove reef off Key Biscayne, Florida. Geol. Assn Am. Bull., 76, pp. 845–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdridge, L. R. (1940). Some notes on the mangrove swamps of Puerto Rico. Caribb. Forest., 1(4), pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
Hou, D. (1958). Rhizophoraceae. Pp. 429–93 in Flora Malesiana Ser. I, No. 5, 342 + 595 pp. (non vidi).Google Scholar
Humm, H. J. (1972). Mangroves in the Anclote estuary. Pp. 82–5 in Anclote Environmental Project Report, 1972, Contrib. No. 41, Inst. Marine Sci., Univ. of South Florida, St Petersburg: 220 pp.Google Scholar
Jenik, J. (1970). Root systems of tropical trees. 5. The peg-roots and pneumathodes of Laguncularia racemosa Gaertn. Preslia (Praha), 42, pp. 105–13.Google Scholar
Little, E. L. Jr, (1953). Check-list of native and naturalized trees of the United States, including Alaska. U.S. Dept of Agric., Agric. Handb. No. 41, 472 pp.Google Scholar
Long, R. W. & Lakela, O. (1971). A Flora of Tropical Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida: xvii + 962 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McMillan, C. (1971). Environmental factors affecting seedling establishment of the Black Mangrove on the central Texas coast. Ecology, 52(5), pp. 927–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnae, W. (1968). A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps in the Indo–West Pacific region. Pp. 73–270 in Advances in Marine Biology, 6, Academic Press, New York: x + 406 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Marco Island Applied Research Center (1973). Annual Progress Report, 1 July 1972 to 30 June 1973. Marco Island Applied Research Center, Marco Island, Florida: 62 pp.Google Scholar
Moldenke, H. N. (1960). Materials toward a monograph of the genus Avicennia. I. Phytologia, 7(3), pp. 123–68. II. Phytologia, 7(4), pp. 179–232. III. Phytologia, 7(5), pp. 259–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, C. L. U. (1967). Distribution and structure of recent stromatolitic algal mats, eastern Andros Island, Bahamas. Ann. Soc. Geol. de Belg., T 90, pp. 55–100.Google Scholar
Multer, H. G. (1969). Field Guide to some Carbonate Rock Environments—Florida Keys and Western Bahamas. Published by the author, Department of Earth Science, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, N.J.: 158 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Odum, W. E. (1971). Pathways of energy flow in a south Florida estuary. Univ. of Miami Sea Grant Bull., 7, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. P. (1903). How mangrove trees add new land to Florida. J. Geog., 2, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Pollard, C. L. (1902). Plant agencies in the formation of the Florida keys. Plant World, 5, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Ranwell, D. S. (1964). Spartina salt marshes in southern England. II. Rate and seasonal pattern of sediment accretion. J. Ecol, 52, pp. 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, A. & Humm, H. J. (1973). Sphaeroma terebrans: a threat to the mangroves of southwestern Florida. Science, 182, pp. 173–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rue, E. A. De La, BourliÈRE, F. & Harroy, J. -P. (1957). The Tropics. Alfred A. Knopf, New York: viii + 209 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sargent, C. S. (1893). The mangrove tree. Garden & Forest, 6, pp. 97–8.Google Scholar
Savage, T. (1972 a). Florida mangroves—a review. Fla. Dep. Nat. Resour., Mar. Res. Lab., Leafl. Ser. Vol. VII, Part 2 (Vascular Plants), No. 1, 15 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Savage, T. (1972 b). Florida mangroves as shoreline stabilizers. Fla. Dep. Nat. Resour., Mar. Res. Lab., Prof. Pap. Ser. No. 19, 46 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Scholander, P. F., Dam, L. Von & Scholander, S. I. (1955). Gas exchange in mangroves. Am. J. Bot., 42, pp. 92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, D. W. (1963). Sedimentation in a modern coastal swamp, southwestern Florida. Bull. Am. Assn Petrol. Geol., 47(8), pp. 1581–1603.Google Scholar
Scholl, D. W. (1964). Recent sedimentary record in mangrove swamps and rise in sea-level over the south western coast of Florida. I. Mar. Geol., 1, pp. 344–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, D. W. (1965). Recent sedimentary record in mangrove swamps and rise in sea-level over the southwestern coast of Florida. II. Mar. Geol., 2, pp. 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, D. W. (1968) Mangrove swamps—geology and sedimentology. Pp. 683–8 in Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences, Vol. III, Reinhold, New York: 974 pp.Google Scholar
Snedaker, S. C. & Lugo, A. E. (1973). The Role of Mangrove Ecosystems in the Maintenance of Envi ronmental Quality and a High Productivity of Desirable Fisheries. Contract No. 14-16-008-606, prepared by the Center for Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville: 380 pp.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. (1910). The geologic work of mangroves in southern Florida. Smithsonian Miscl. Coll., 52, pp. 461–4.Google Scholar
Voss, G. (1969). Preserving Florida's estuaries. Fla. Naturalist, 19(4), Suppl. pp. 2–4.Google Scholar
Welch, B. L. (1963). From coral reef to tropical island via Thalassia and mangrove. Va. Acad. Sci. J., 14(4), pp. 213–4 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Woodruff, R. E. (1970). A mangrove borer, Poecilips rhizophorae (Hopkins). Fla. Dept Agric. & Consum. Affairs, Div. Plant Industry, Bureau of Entomology, Entomol. Circul. No. 98, 2 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ziemann, J. C. (1972). Origin of circular beds of Thalassia (Spermatophyta: Hydrocharitaceae) in south Biscayne Bay, Florida, and their relationship to mangrove hammocks. Bull. Inst. Mar. Sci., Univ. of Miami, 22(3), pp. 559–74.Google Scholar