Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T00:32:56.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Will Guatemala's Juniperus—Pinus Forests Survive?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Gerald Islebe
Gerald Islebe
Affiliation:
Hugo de Vries Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 318, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Short Communications & Reports
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Summer 1993, pp. 167 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon. (1992). In ‘Prensa Libre, Suplemento Ecológico’, Guatemala City, Guatemala: pp. 14–5.Google Scholar
Castañeda, C. (1980). Gorgojo del pino en Guatemala. Serie Separatas Anuario N° 38. Guatemala. 30 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Encuesta Nacional Sociodemográfica (1989). Institute Nacional de Estadistíca, Guatemala: 167 pp.Google Scholar
LaBastille [Bowes], A. & Allen, D.G. (1969). Biology and conservation of the Quetzal. Biological Conservation, 1, pp. 297–306, 5 figs and table.Google Scholar
Perfil Ambiental de la Republica de Guatemala (1987). Universidad Rafael Landívar, Vista Hermosa III, Zona 16, Apdo Postal 39 ‘C’, Guatemala: pp. 99–200 [of 384 pp. in 3 tomes].Google Scholar
Veblen, T.T. (1976). The urgent need for forest conservation in highland Guatemala. Biological Conservation, 9, pp. 141–54, 4 figs and table.CrossRefGoogle Scholar