Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:05:14.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wog Wog Habitat Fragmentation Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Christopher R. Margules
Christopher R. Margules
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Wildlife & Ecology, PO Box 84, Lyneham, ACT 2602, Australia.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An experiment to study the effects of habitat fragmentation on biological diversity was commenced in an Eucalyptus forest, in February 1985, at Wog Wog in southeastern New South Wales, Australia. The two hypotheses which are being tested are (1) that habitat fragmentation reduces biological diversity, and (2) that the reduction in diversity is fragment-size dependent.

The experimental design consists of three fragment-sizes replicated six times. The sizes are 0.25 ha, 0.875 ha, and 3.062 ha, the two larger ones being progressively c. 3.5 times the size of the smaller ones. Four replicates (12 fragments) were retained as Eucalyptus forest when the surrounding land was cleared for a softwood (Pinus radiata) plantation. Two replicates (six fragments) are controls in an adjacent State Forest.

The sampling is stratified into slopes, drainage lines, and inner and outer zones, with samples replicated twice in each stratum. Thus, there are two outer slope and two outer drainage-line sample sites, and two inner slope and two inner drainage-line sample sites. This gives 144 permanent sample sites within the Eucalyptus forest.

Following the experimental treatment, a further 44 permanent sample sites were established between the fragments. Aranae, Phalangida, Formicidae, Scorpionidae, Diplopoda, Coleoptera, and vascular plants, are the main groups of organisms involved in the experiment. Mosses and liverworts, breeding birds, small ground-mammals, skinks, and bats, are also being monitored.

Monitoring commenced in February 1985. The experimental treatment, i.e. forest fragmentation, took place during 1987. Two years after the treatment there were still no experimental results, because of the inherent delays in sorting and identifying the arthropods, and in establishing and managing the very large database involved. However, the analysis of some pre-treatment data is used to assess the experimental design. This analysis demonstrates the importance of adequate replication in ecological field experiments.

Information

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Winter 1992, pp. 316 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, M.P. (1978). Vegetation. Pp. 44–66 in Land Use on the South Coast of New South Wales (Eds Austin, M.P. & Cocks, K.D.), Vol. 2. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia: vii + 119 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Austin, M.P. & Nicholls, A.O. (1988). Species associations within herbaceous vegetation in an Australian Eucalypt forest. Pp. 95–114 in Diversity and Pattern in Plant Comunities (Eds During, H.J., Werger, M.J.A. & Willems, J.H.). SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands: viii + 278 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Belbin, L. (1987). PATN: Pattern Analysis Package, Reference Manual. CSIRO Division of Wildlife & Ecology, Canberra, Australia: 196 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, L.W. (1983). Studies on the arboreal marsupial fauna of Eucalypt forests being harvested for woodpulp at Eden, N.S.W., I: The species and distribution of animals. Australian Wildlife Research, 10, pp. 219–29, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, L.W., Dudzinski, M.L. & Turner, J. (1983). Studies on the arboreal marsupial fauna of Eucalypt forests being harvested for woodpulp at Eden, N.S.W., II: Relationship Between the Fauna Density, Richness and Diversity, and Measured Variables of the Habitat. Australian Wildlife Research, 10, pp. 231–47, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, L.W., Turner, J. & Kelly, J. (1984). Studies on the arboreal marsupial fauna of Eucalypt forests being harvested for woodpulp at Eden, N.S.W., III: Relationships Between Faunal densities, Eucalypt occurrence and foliage nutrients, and soil parent materials. Australian Wildlife Research, 11, pp. 41–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, J.R. & Curtis, J.T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27, pp. 325–49, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costin, A.B. (1954). A Study of the Ecosystems of the Monaro Region of N.S.W., with Special Reference to Soil Erosion. New South Wales Government Printer, Sydney, Australia: xi + 860 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Diamond, J.M. (1975). The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation, 7, pp. 129–46, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. (1987). Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance: a theoretical model and computer simulations. Vegetatio, 69, pp. 57–68, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1988). Forest Operations in the Eden Management Area: Environmental Impact Statement. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia: xviii + 102 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Frankel, O.H. & Soule, M.E. (1981). Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: 327 pp.Google Scholar
Gilpin, M.E. & Soule, M.E. (1986). Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pp. 19–34 in Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (Ed. Soule, M.E.). Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: xiii + 584 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harris, L.D. (1989). Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conservation Biology, 2, pp. 330–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, L.R. & Patterson, B.D. (Eds) (1986). Island Biogeography of Mammals. (Reprinted from the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 28 (1 & 2).) Academic Press, London, England, UK: iii + 271 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Higgs, A.J. (1981). Island biogeography theory and nature reserve design. Journal of Biogeography, 8, pp. 117–24, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, A.J. & Usher, M.B. (1980). Should nature reserves be large or small? Nature (London), 285, pp. 568–9, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, S.W.L. & Pickhard, J. (1981). Plants of New South Wales. New South Wales Government Printer, Sydney, NSW, Australia: 226 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, R.P., Shields, J.M., Recher, H.F. & Rohan-Jones, W.G. (1985). Bird populations of a logged and unlogged forest mosaic at Eden, New South Wales. Pp. 273–81 in Birds of Eucalypt Forests and Woodlands: Ecology, Conservation and Management (Eds Keat, A., Recher, H.F., Ford, H. & Saunders, D.A.). Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union and Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, Australia: 384 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Keith, D.A. & Sanders, J.M. (1990). Vegetation of the Eden region, south-eastern Australia: species composition, diversity and structure. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1, pp. 203–32, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard, R.O., Rankin, J.M. & Schubart, H.O.R. (1983). Ecological dynamics of tropical forest fragments. Pp. 377–84 in Tropical Rainforests: Ecology and Management (Eds Sutton, S.L., Whitmore, T.C. & Chadwick, A.C.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, UK: xiii + 498 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E., Rankin, J.M., Bierregaard, R.O., Brown, K.S., Emmons, L.H. & Voort, M.E. van der (1984). Ecosystem decay in Amazon forest remnants. Pp. 295–325 in Extinctions (Ed. Nitecki, M.H.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA: ix + 354 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.G. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Margules, C.R., Higgs, A.J. & Rafe, R.W. (1982). Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design? Biological Conservation, 24, pp. 115–28, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. & Pressey, R.L. (1988). Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological Conservation, 43, pp. 63–76, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S.L. (1986). Community Stability and Structure. Pp. 309–29 in Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (Ed. Soule, M.E.). Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: xiii + 584 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pressey, R.L. & Nicholls, A.O. (1989). Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological Conservation, 50, pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J.F. & Robinson, G.R. (1987). The effects of experimental subdivision on flowering plant diversity in a California annual grassland. Journal of Ecology, 75, pp. 837–56, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, M.L. & Sansom, F.B. (1985). Population size and extinction: a note on determining critical population size. American Naturalist, 125, pp. 144–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recher, H.F. (1985). Synthesis: a model of forest and woodland bird communities. Pp. 129–35 in Birds of Eucalypt Forests and Woodlands: Ecology, Conservation and Management (Eds Keast, A., Recher, H.F. & Saunders, D.A.). Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union and Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, Australia: 384 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1988). The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 19, pp. 473–511, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D.S. & Abele, L.G. (1976). Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science, 193, pp. 1029–30, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D.S. & Abele, L.G. (1982). Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation. American Naturalist, 120, pp. 41–50, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Gotelli, N. (1984). Effects of insularisation on plant species richness in the prairie-forest ecotone. Biological Conservation, 29, pp. 27–46, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P.H. & Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco, California, USA: xv + 573 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Soule, M.E. & Simberloff, D.S. (1986). What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of Nature reserves? Biological Conservation, 35, pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. (1981). Island Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xi + 286 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. & Willis, E.O. (1975). Applied biogeography. Pp. 522–34 in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (Eds Cody, M.L. & Diamond, J.M.). Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: 545 pp., illustr.Google Scholar