Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T16:38:05.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet and Tuberculosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Harry Schütze  and
S. S. Zilva
Harry Schütze
Affiliation:
From the Lister Institute, London.
S. S. Zilva
Affiliation:
From the Lister Institute, London.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Guinea-pigs living on a diet restricted in quantity but not deficient in vitamin C survived inoculation with T.B. but half as long as others which had received a similar diet in abundance.

Sodium chaulmoograte did not inhibit the development of the omental tumour that appears in rats after intraperitoneal inoculation with tubercle bacilli.

On the other hand, there was some evidence for assuming that a large excess of fat-soluble vitamins in the diet, as supplied by cod-liver oil, inhibits the formation in rats of these tuberculous tumours, but such evidence was by no means conclusive.

Similar inhibition of omental infection was obtained on exposing rats to ultra-violet light.

Ultra-violet irradiation or the inclusion of large amounts of cod-liver oil in the diet of the rats produced a slight but constant leucocytosis.

No evidence was obtained that lack of fat soluble vitamins in their diet renders tubercle infected rats susceptible to tuberculin shock.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , July 1927 , pp. 204 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

References

Cramer, W., Drew, A. H. and Mottram, J. C. (1921). Lancet, ii, 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, W. and Kingsbury, A. N. (1924). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 5, 300.Google Scholar
Gloyne, S. R. and Page, D. S. (1921). Tubercle, 3, 1.Google Scholar
Lindenburg, A. and Pestana, B. (1921). Zeitschr. f. Immunität. 32, 66.Google Scholar
McCollum, E. V., Simmonds, N. and Pitz, W. (1917). J. Biol. Chem. 29, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mottram, J. C. and Kingsbury, A. N. (1924). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 5, 220.Google Scholar
Mouriquand, C., Michel, P. and Bertoye, P. (1923). C. R. Soc. Biol. 88, 1043.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. B. and Sturm, E. (1919). J. Exp. Med. 29, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. I. (1923). Am. Rev. Tub. 7, 33.Google Scholar
Smith, M. I. (1926). U.S.A. Pub. Health Rep. 41, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbock, Nelson and Black, (1924). J. Biol. Chem. 72, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. D. and Murphy, J. B. (1917). J. Exp. Med. 25, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. and Sweeney, M. (1920). J. Infect. Dis. 26, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werkman, C. H. (1923). J. Infect. Dis. 32, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilva, S. S. (1919). Biochem. J. 13, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar