Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T13:07:50.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Studies in Anti-Rabies Immunisation. Rabies Virus—Exalted and Classical Strains Compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Stuart and
K. S. Krikorian
G. Stuart
Affiliation:
(Central Laboratories, Department of Health, Government of Palestine.)
K. S. Krikorian
Affiliation:
(Central Laboratories, Department of Health, Government of Palestine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

1. The occurrence of an exalted strain of rabies virus has been recorded and a definition given of virus de rue renforcé.

2. The characteristics of exalted virus have been examined in respect of incubation time, fixation rate and absence of Negri bodies.

3. An adequate classification of street virus strains has been suggested.

4. Cross-immunity experiments have been carried out and, as a result of cross-protection tests and of crossed serum reactions, identity of exalted virus with the classical strain has been established.

5. The employment of autogenous and polyvalent vaccines has been shown to be unnecessary in anti-rabies immunisation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 1931, pp. 523 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

References

REFERENCES

Abba, (1898). Statistique de l'Institut antirabique de Turin. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 12, 34.Google Scholar
Alivisatos, (1926). Neue Erfahrungen bei der Schutzimpfung gegen Lyssa durch das ätherisierte Virus fixe. Zentralbl. Bakt. 98, 394.Google Scholar
d'Amato, (1904). Sur l'existence dans la nature d'un virus rabique renforcé Riforma med. 11, 1.Google Scholar
Babes, (1912). Traité de la rage. Paris: Baillière et Fils.Google Scholar
Bauer, (1886). Inkubationsdauer der Tollwut beim Menschen. München. med. Wochenschr. 1, 37–39.Google Scholar
Beham, (1915). Schnelle Verwandlung des Strassenvirus der Tollwut in Virus fixe. München. med. Wochenschr. 30, 841.Google Scholar
Bouffard, (1912). Sur l'existence de la rage canine dans le Haut-Sénégal et le Niger. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 38, 258.Google Scholar
Busson, (1928). Charakteristik des Begriffes Virus fixe. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 41, 1145.Google Scholar
Calabrese, (1896). Sur l'existence dans la nature d'un virus rabique renforcé. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 10, 97.Google Scholar
Calderini, (1928). Un caso di eccezionale esaltazione della virulenza del virus rabbico nella cavia. Giorn. di Batteriol. e Immunol. 3, 429.Google Scholar
Harvey, and Acton, (1923). The degree of efficacy of antirabic treatment. Ind. J. Med. Res. 9, 868.Google Scholar
Harvey, and McKendrick, (1930). “Rabies” in A System of Bacteriology. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Heckenroth, (1918). Contribution à l'étude de la rage en Afrique occidentale française. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 32, 389.Google Scholar
Helman, (1888). Étude sur les formes furieuses et paralytiques de la rage chez le lapin. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 2, 274.Google Scholar
Hoegyes, (1900). “Lyssa” in Nothnagel's Spezielle Pathologie und Therapie. Vienna.Google Scholar
Koch, J. (1929). Kann die Differentialdiagnose, ob der Tod eines während oder nach der Pasteurschen Schutzimpfung gestorbenen Patienten durch das Strassen- oder Passagevirus verursacht wurde, durch den Tierversuch gestellt werden? Zentralbl. Bakt. 113, 376.Google Scholar
Koch, and Rissling, (1910). Studien zur Aetiologie der Tollwut. Zeitschr. Hyg. InfektKr. 65, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konradi, (1923). Auffallend kurze Inkubationen bei menschlicher Wut. Zentralbl. Bakt. 90, 162.Google Scholar
Levaditi, Nicolau and Schoen, (1924 a). La nature du virus rabique. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 90, 994.Google Scholar
Levaditi, Nicolau and Schoen, (1924 b). La nature mierosporidienne du virus rabique. C.R. Soc. Biol., 90, 398.Google Scholar
Levaditi, Nicolau and Schoen, (1926). Recherches sur la rage. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 40, 973.Google Scholar
Lubinski, and Prausnitz, (1926). Lyssa. Ergebn. Hyg. Bakt. 8, 1.Google Scholar
McKendrick, (1929). Rabies. A review of recent articles. Trop. Dis. Bull. 26, 216.Google Scholar
Manouélian, (1912). Étude des corpuscules de Negri et des formations spéciales à la rage à virus fixe. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 26, 973.Google Scholar
Manouélian, and Viala, (1924). “Encephalitozoon rabiei” parasite de la rage. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 38, 258.Google Scholar
Marie, (1927). La nature du virus rabique. Report to International Rabies Conference.Google Scholar
Negri, (1909). Ueber die Morphologie und den Entwicklungszyklus des Parasiten der Tollwut. Zeitschr. Hyg. InfetKr. 63, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puntoni, (1923). La pluralità biologica del virus rabico da strada. Ann. Igiene (sper.), 33, 1.Google Scholar
Remlinger, (1908). La rage chez les tout jeunes chiens. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 60, 508.Google Scholar
Remlinger, (1924). Sur un virus renforce recueilli au Maroc. Bull. Soc. Path, exotique, 17, 538.Google Scholar
Remlinger, (1926). Note sur les virus de rue envoyés de Tanger à M. Levaditi. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 40, 1070.Google Scholar
Remlinger, (1928). Quelques considérations sur la rage et le traitement antirabique dans les pays tropicaux. Bull. Soc. Path. exotique, 21, 790.Google Scholar
Remlinger, and Bailly, (1930). Unicité ou pluralité du virus rabique. Bull. Acad. Méd., Paris, 103, 408.Google Scholar
Remlinger, and Curasson, (1924). Identité de l'oulou-fato et de la rage. Bull. Acad. Méd., 92, 112.Google Scholar
Schweinburg, (1925). Ueber das Virus Koritschoner. Zeitschr. Immunitätsforsch. 42, 552.Google Scholar
Schweinburg, (1928). Zur Frage der Virulenz des Virus fixe. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 41, 1149.Google Scholar
Stuart, and Krikorian, (1929). Studies in antirabies immunisation. J. Hyg., Camb. 29, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teodorascu, (1929). Études expérimentales sur la virulence particulière de deux souches de virus rabique. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 100, 929.Google Scholar
Watson, (1913). The Negri bodies in rabies. J. Exp. Med. 17, 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, and Lowden, (1906). The etiology and diagnosis of hydrophobia. J. Infect. Dis. 3, 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar