Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:23:55.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intradermal versus subcutaneous immunization with typhoid vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. Iwarson and
P. Larsson
S. Iwarson
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Göteborg, East Hospital, S-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden
P. Larsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Göteborg, S-413 46 Göteborg, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Swedish nationals about to travel abroad were immunized against typhoid with a monovalent heat-inactivated vaccine which was administered intra- or subcutaneously. No major differences in serum antibody response were noted in the two groups of vaccinees as determined with direct agglutination and indirect hemagglutination techniques. As the intracutaneous route caused fewer adverse reactions this way of administration seems to be preferable.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1980, pp. 11 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Bardhan, P. N., Dutta, H. N. & Krishnaswami, P. (1963). Intradermal TAB immuniza tion against enteric infections. Journal of Hygiene 61, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yu-Tú & Ch'en, Tschung-Hsien (1958). Reaction and immune response to typhoid and paratyphoid vaccines of different dosages and routes of injection. Chinese Medical Journal 76 (4), 47.Google Scholar
Clasener, H. A. L. & Beunders, B. J. W. (1967). Immunization of man with typhoid and cholera vaccine. Agglutination antibodies after intracutaneous and subcutaneous injection. Journal of Hygiene 65, 449.Google ScholarPubMed
Editorial (1970). British Medical Journal i, 354.Google Scholar
Hanson, L. A. & Brandtzaeg, P. (1979). Mucosal defense symptoms. In Infants and Children (ed. Stiehm, E. R. and Fulginiti, L. V. A.), 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Hanson, L. A., Holmgren, J., Jodal, U. & Kaijser, B. (1971). Characterization of precipitating antibodies to E. coli O antigen in infants and children with acute pyelonephritis. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 8, 573.Google Scholar
Hejfec, L. B., Levina, L. A., Kuz'minova, M. L., Salmin, L. V., Slavina, A. M. & Vasil'eva, A. V. (1968). Controlled field trials of paratyphoid B vaccine and evaluation of the effectiveness of a single administration of typhoid vaccine. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 38, 907.Google ScholarPubMed
Hooper, W. L. (1964). T. A. B. reactions. British Medical Journal ii, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwarson, S. (1977). Vaccination against tyfoid-paratyfoid. Läkartidningen 74, 409.Google Scholar
Jodal, U. (1975). The immune response to urinary tract infection in childhood. I. Serological diagnosis of primary symptomatic infection in girls. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 64, 9..Google ScholarPubMed
Kauffmann, F. (1969). The Bacteriology of Enterobacteriaceae, 2nd ed., p. 86. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Luippold, G. F. (1944). Typhoid vaccine studies. IX. Intracutaneous versus subcutaneous vaccination for initial immunization. American Journal of Public Health 34, 1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, H. R., Favorite, G. O. & Horneff, J. A. (1943). Immunizing potency in man of a purified antigenic material isolated from Eberthella typhosa. Journal of Immunology 46, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neter, E. (1956). Bacterial hemagglutination and hemolysis. Bacteriological Reviews 20, 166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svennerholm, A.-M., Holmgren, J., Hanson, L.Å., Lindblad, B. S., Quereshi, F. & Rahimtoola, R. J. (1977). Boosting of secretory IgA antibody responses in man by parenteral cholera vaccination. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 6, 1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuft, L., Yagle, E. M. & Rogers, S. (1932). Comparative study of the antibody response after various methods of administration of mixed typhoid vaccine. Journal of Infectious Diseases 50, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, A. J. (1964). T. A. B. reactions. British Medical Journal, ii, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar