Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:09:10.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Dysentery Toxin and Antitoxin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Charles Todd
Charles Todd
Affiliation:
Senior Assistant Bacteriologist, Serum Department, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

One of the most striking points in the pathology of Bacterial Dysentery is the fact that while the bacilli are found regularly in the mesenteric glands, they are not found in the spleen or other organs, and do not occur in the blood, urine, or milk. In this respect Lentz (p. 320) points out that the disease differs markedly from the septicaemic diseases, such as typhoid, and that it must be regarded as a local infection of the intestinal mucous membrane and corresponding lymphatic glands by the bacillus, the toxin alone passing into the circulation and giving rise to the typical clinical picture, which, as in the case of cholera, gives the impression of a severe poisoning or toxaemia.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1904, pp. 480 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1904

References

Conradi, (1903). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dönitz, (1897). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, (1897). Klinisches Jahrbuch, Band VI., p. 13.Google Scholar
Eyre, (30. iv. 1904). Brit. Med. Journ., p. 1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, (20. iii. 1896). Lecture, Royal Institution. Nature, pp. 569–572, 592—597.Google Scholar
Gay, (xi. 1902). Vaccination and Serum Therapy against the Bacillus of Dysentery. (Reprint from University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin.)Google Scholar
Gay, (7. viii. 1903). The types of B. dysenteriae (Shiga) in relation to Bacteriolysis and Serum Therapy. An experimental study. (Reprint from University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin.)Google Scholar
Knorr, (1897). Fortschr. der Medizin, Bd. xv., pp. 65–67, and München. med. Wochenschr., 1898, p. 321.Google Scholar
Kruse, (1903). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 49.Google Scholar
Lentz, . Handbuch der pathogenen Mikroorganismen. Lieferung VII., pp. 320, 328.Google Scholar
Lentz, (1902). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene. Bd. XLI., p. 559.Google Scholar
Martin, and Cherry, (1898). Proc. Royal Society. Vol. LXIII., p. 420.Google Scholar
Martini, and Lentz, (1902). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene. Vol. XLI., p. 540.Google Scholar
Neisser, and Shiga, (1903). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, (1904). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiga, (ii. 1903). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiga, (iv. 1903). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, (5. xii. 1903). Brit. Med. Journ., p. 1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar