Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:18:10.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Precipitin, Complementbinding, and Anti-opsonic Tests in Tuberculous and Normal Cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. E. Porter
A. E. Porter
Affiliation:
(From the Royal Victoria Hospital Laboratory, Edinburgh. Director, Dr R. W. Philip.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The recognition of latent tuberculosis, difficult as it often is in the human subject, is of necessity more difficult in the case of cattle. It is especially in early disease that the serum reactions prove often most useful as an aid to diagnosis, but in cattle a proof is also often desired that no pronounced disease is present, because it is by no means of rare occurrence that an apparently fat and healthy animal must be rejected after slaughter.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1911, pp. 105 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1911

References

Arloing, (1898). Agglutination du bacille de la tuberculose vraie. Compt. Rend. Acad. de Sci. p. 1398.Google Scholar
Arloing, (1901). Die Serumdiagnostik bei der Tuberkulose des Rindes. Berlin. Klin. Wochenschr. p. 712.Google Scholar
Bail, and Kikuchi, (1905). Bakterizide Reagensglasversuche mit Choleravibrionen. Archiv f. Hyg. Vol. LIII. p. 275.Google Scholar
Bang, (see Ostertag).Google Scholar
Beck, and Rabinowitch, (1901). Weitere Untersuchungen über den Werth der Arloing-Courmontschen Serum Reaktion bei Tuberkulose speziell bei Rindertuberkulose. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, V. and Savini, (1907). Das hämolytische Hemmungsphänomen bei Phosphorvergiftung und anderen pathologischen Prozessen. Zeitschr. f. exper. Pathol. u. Therap. Vol. IV. p. 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camus, and Payniez, (1901). Variabilité de Alexine dans les sérums pathologiques. Existence d'une substance antihémolysante dans le sérum humain. Compt. Rend. Soc. de Biol. p. 730.Google Scholar
Centanni, (1908). Untersuchungen über die durch die opsonische Reaktion hervorgerufenen Chemotropine. Zeitschr. f. physiol. Chemie, Vol. LV. p. 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, and Bearn, (1906). The effect of heat on enzyme activity. Proc. Physiol. Soc. June, p. 36.Google Scholar
Cramer, and Bearn, (1907). On Zymoids. Biochem. Journ. p. 174.Google Scholar
Dean, (1905). An experimental enquiry into the nature of the substance in serum which influences phagocytosis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Vol. LXXVI. p. 506.Google Scholar
Fornet, and Porter, (1907). Ueber den Bau der Opsonine. Verhandl. d. Ges. Dtschr. Naturf. u. Aerzte. Dresden.Google Scholar
Fornet, and Porter, (1908). Ueber den Bau der Opsonine. Paratyphusopsonine. Centralbl. f. Bakt. Abt. 1, Vol. XLVIII. p. 461.Google Scholar
Fornet, and Porter, (1909). Opsonine und Antiopsonine in ihrer Wirkung auf Tuberkelbazillen. Centralbl. f. Bakt. Abt. 1, Vol. LI. p. 138.Google Scholar
Haetjens, (1907). Ueber das Ausbleiben der Phagocytose bei Komplementbindung. München. med. Wochenschr. p. 560.Google Scholar
Hektoen, (1906). Phagocytosis and Opsonins. Journ. Amer. med. Assoc. Vol. XLVI. p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hektoen, (1909). On the mechanism of opsonic action. Journ. of Infectious Diseases, Vol. VI. p. 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hektoen, and Ruediger, (1905). Studies in Phagocytosis. Journ. of Infectious Diseases, Vol. II. p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Eva (1907). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die hemmende Wirkung inaktivierter Sera. Zeitschr. f. exper. Pathol. u. Therap. Vol. IV. p. 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, (1909). Bakterien-Antifermente und Bakteriolyse. München. med. Wochenschr. Nr. 56, p. 897.Google Scholar
Koch, (1901). Ueber die Agglutination der Tuberkelbazillen und über die Verwertung dieser Agglutination. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledingham, (1907). Inhibitive action upon subsequent phagocytosis exerted on active normal serum by inactive normal serum through which bacteria have been passed. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. p. 482.Google Scholar
Levy, and Fornet, (1906). Ueber Filtrataggressine. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Nr. 26, p. 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. (1908). Ueber die Phagocytosebefördernden Substanzen des Blutserums. Berlin. Klin. Wochenschr. Nr. 20, p. 951.Google Scholar
Neisser, and Doering, (1901). Zur Kenntnis der hämolytischen Eigenschaften des menschlichen Blutserums. Berlin. Klin. Wochenschr. Nr. 22, p. 593.Google Scholar
Neufeld, and Rimpau, (1904). Ueber die Antikörper des Staphylokokken- und Pneumokokkenimmunserums. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nocard, (see Ostertag).Google Scholar
Ostertag, (1904). Handbook of meat inspection (trans. by Willcox), p. 603.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, and Friedberger, (1905). Ueber antibakteriolytische (antagonistische) Substanzen normaler Sera. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Vol. XXXI. p. 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, (1905). Zur Frage der einheitlichen und spezifischen Natur des Pankreastrypsins. Hofmeister's Beiträge, Vol. VI. p. 95.Google Scholar
Porter, A. E. (1910). The precipitin reaction in tuberculosis. Journ. of Infectious Diseases, January, p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. E. (1910). Ueber die Inaktivierung von Fermenten und die Entstehung von Antifermenten in der Gegenwart von Kollodium und anderen Membranen. Biochem. Zeitschr. p. 301.Google Scholar
Porter, A. E. (1910). On the inactivation of ferments and the production of antiferments in the presence of artificial membranes. Quart. Journ. of Exper. Physiol. December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, A. E. (1911). Serum reactions in Tuberculosis, from Sutherland's Control and Prevention of Tuberculosis (in the press).Google Scholar
Pribram, (1910). Ueber Opsonine des normalen Aktivserums. Wion. klin. Wochenschr. 08, p. 1131.Google Scholar
Rosenow, (1906). The rôle of phagocytosis in the pneumococcicidal action of pneumonic blood. Journ. of Infectious Diseases, Vol. III. p. 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, (1909). Ueber Opsonine. Jahresber. über die Ergebnisse der Immunitätsforschung, Vol. III.Google Scholar
Schwarz, (1905). Zur Kenntnis der Antipepsine. Hofmeister's Beiträge zur chem. Physiol. u. Path. Vol. VI. p. 524.Google Scholar
Sellards, (1908). Note on the nature of opsonic immunity. Journ. of Infectious Diseases, p. 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siedamgrotsky, (see Ostertag).Google Scholar
Slosse, and Limbosch, (1909). Étude sur l'adsorption des ferments digestifs par la collodion. Archiv intern. d. Physiol. 12. p. 417.Google Scholar
Szaboky, (1909). Erfahrungen über die praktische Verwertung der Komplement-bindung und anderer bakteriologischer und serologischer Untersuchungen bei der Diagnose der Lungentuberkulose. Zeitschr. f. Tuberkulose, Vol. XIV. p. 249.Google Scholar
Weil, (1905). Ueber Agglutinationsbehinderung der Typhusbazillen. Archiv f. Hyg. Vol. LIII. p. 291.Google Scholar
Weil, and Tsuda, (1907). Ueber Behinderung der Reagensglas-Phagocytose. Berlin. Klin. Wochenschr. p. 1038.Google Scholar
Weinland, (1902). Ueber Antifermente. Zeitschr. f. Biol. Vol. XLIV. p. 45.Google Scholar
Welsh, and Chapman, (1907). On certain phenomena of inactivation and of inhibition exhibited by precipitin antisera. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. p. 465.Google Scholar