Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T15:03:02.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rubella vaccines: past, present and future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. M. Best
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, United Medical and Dental Schools and Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals, St Thomas' Campus, Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The association between rubella in pregnancy and congenital anomalies was first reported 50 years ago, by N. McAlister Gregg, an Australian ophthalmologist [1]. During the next 20 years his findings were confirmed by others (reviewed in [2]). However, the first reports of the isolation of rubella virus in cell cultures and development of tests for neutralizing antibodies were not published until 1962 [3, 4]. Subsequent studies conducted in the UK and North America during a pandemic of rubella in 1963–4, were therefore able to make a more accurate estimate of the risks of maternal rubella at different stages of pregnancy. It was estimated that about 30000 rubella-damaged babies were born in the USA alone in 1963–4 [5]. This emphasized the importance of developing a vaccine to prevent infection in pregnancy and thereby, the birth of babies with rubella-induced congenital defects.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991