An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Als-Nielsen, B., Chen, W., Gluud, C. & Kjaergard, Lise L. (2003). Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?Journal of American Medical Association290, 921–928.Google Scholar
Essock, S.M., Drake, R.E., Frank, R.G. & McGuire, T.G. (2003). Randomized controlled trials in evidence-based mental health care: getting the right answer to the right questionSchizophrenia Bulletin29, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J.P., Evans, S.J., Gotzsche, P.C., O'Neill, R., Altman, D.G., Schulz, K. & Moher, D. for the CONSORT Group (2004). Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CON-SORT statementAnnals of Internetional Medicine141, 781–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (1985). Assessing Medical Technologies.National Academy Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Schulz, K.F. & Altman, D. (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.Journal of American Medical Association285, 1987–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheck, R.A. (2005). Open forum: effectiveness versus efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics: haloperidol without anticholinergics as a comparatorPsychiatric Services56, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunis, S.R., Stryer, D.B. & Clancy, CM. (2003). Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Journal of American Medical Association290, 1624–1632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed