Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:52:46.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An area approach to wandering domains for smooth surface endomorphisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Alec Norton
Alec Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove an infinite-area lemma for maps which are area non-contracting on the boundaries of certain domains; the maps are required to be smooth to the extent that their Jacobians are twice differentiable (see Main Lemma below). It will follow that a hyperbolic rational map has no wandering simply connected domains. As a more direct corollary, a C3 diffeomorphism f of a compact smooth 2-manifold cannot have a wandering domain Δ if f is area non-contracting on the boundary of each forward image of Δ.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1991, pp. 181 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Blanchard, P.. Complex analytic dynamics in the Riemann sphere. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (New Series) 11 (1984), 85–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Denjoy, A.. Sur les courbes définies par les équations différentielles à la surface du tore. J. de Math. Pures et Appl. 11 (9) (1932), 333–375.Google Scholar
[3]Hall, G. R.. A generalization of Denjoy's theorem on diffeomorphisms of the circle. Technical Summary Report no. 2516, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Mathematics Research Center. May 1983.Google Scholar
[4]Harrison, J.. C 2 Counterexamples to the Seifert conjecture. Topology 27 (3) (1988), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Harrison, J.. A diffeomorphism of a compact surface with a wandering disc D cannot be C 3 if there is a recurrent point on the boundary of D along whose forward orbit there is ‘bounded distortion’. Unpublished notes.Google Scholar
[6]Herman, M.. Sur la conjugaison différentiable des difféomorphisms du cercle à des rotations. Publ. Math. IHES 49 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Norton, A.. Minimal sets, wandering domains, and rigidity in the 2-torus. In: Proc. of the 1989 Joint Summer Research Conference on Relationships Between Continuum Theory and the Theory of Dynamical Systems. Contemp. Math. (1991), to appear.Google Scholar
[8]Norton, A. & Veiling, J.. Denjoy-like theorems for diffeomorphisms of the 2-torus.Google Scholar
[9]Spivak, M.. A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Vol. II. Publish or Perish: 1979.Google Scholar
[10]Sullivan, D.. Conformal dynamical systems. Geometric Dynamics, pp. 725–752. Lecture Notes in Math. 1007. Springer: New York, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Sullivan, D.. Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and Dynamics, II. Acta Math. 155 (1985), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar