Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:55:08.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closed subgroups generated by generic measure automorphisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2013

SŁAWOMIR SOLECKI
SŁAWOMIR SOLECKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, 1409 W. Green St., University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA (email: ssolecki@math.uiuc.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We prove that for a generic measure-preserving transformation $T$, the closed group generated by $T$ is a continuous homomorphic image of a closed linear subspace of $L_0(\lambda , {\mathbb R})$, where $\lambda $ is the Lebesgue measure, and that the closed group generated by $T$contains an increasing sequence of finite-dimensional tori whose union is dense.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 1011 - 1017
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

References

[1]Ageev, O. N.. The generic automorphism of a Lebesgue space is conjugate to a $G$-extension for any finite abelian group $G$. Dok. Math. 62 (2000), 216–219.Google Scholar
[2]Ageev, O. N.. On the genericity of some nonasymptotic dynamic properties. Russian Math. Surveys 58 (2003), 173–174.Google Scholar
[3]Akcoglu, M. A., Chacon, R. V. and Schwartzbaur, T.. Commuting transformations and mixing. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1970), 637–642.Google Scholar
[4]Fabec, R. C.. Fundamentals of Infinite Dimensional Representation Theory. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2000.Google Scholar
[5]Farah, I. and Solecki, S.. Extreme amenability of $L_0$, a Ramsey theorem, and Lévy groups. J. Funct. Anal. 255 (2008), 471–493.Google Scholar
[6]Glasner, E. and Weiss, B.. Spatial and non-spatial actions of Polish groups. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25 (2005), 1521–1538.Google Scholar
[7]Halmos, P. R.. In general a measure preserving transformation is mixing. Ann. of Math. (2) 45 (1944), 786–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Katok, A. and Stepin, A. M.. Approximations in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 77–102.Google Scholar
[9]King, J.. The generic transformation has roots of all orders. Colloq. Math. 84/85 (2000), 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Melleray, J. and Tsankov, T.. Generic representations of abelian groups and extreme amenability. Israel J. Math. to appear.Google Scholar
[11]Pedersen, G. K.. Analysis Now. Springer, Berlin, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]de la Rue, T. and de Sam Lazaro, J.. Une transformation générique peut être insérée dans un flot. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Stat. 39 (2003), 121–134.Google Scholar
[13]Stepin, A. M. and Eremenko, A. M.. Non-unique inclusion in a flow and vast centralizer of a generic measure-preserving transformation. Sb. Math. 195 (2004), 1795–1808.Google Scholar