Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T07:23:32.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ergodic elements for actions of Lie groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

K. Robert Gutschera
K. Robert Gutschera
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02181, USA (e-mail: krg@olaf.wellesley.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given a connected Lie group G acting ergodically on a space S with finite invariant measure, one can ask when G will contain single elements (or one-parameter subgroups) that still act ergodically. For a compact simple group or the isometry group of the plane, or any group projecting onto such groups, an ergodic action may have no ergodic elements, but for any other connected Lie group ergodic elements will exist. The proof uses the unitary representation theory of Lie groups and Lie group structure theory.

Information

Type
Survey Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , August 1996 , pp. 703 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[A]Auslander, L.. An exposition of the structure of solvmanifolds. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 227–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[AM]Auslander, L. and Moore, C. C.. Unitary representations of solvable Lie groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 62 (1966).Google Scholar
[BM]Brezin, J. and Moore, C. C.. Flows on homogeneous spaces: a new look. Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), 571–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[D]Dani, S. G.. Dense Orbits of Horospherical Flows, Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory. Banach Center Publications 23, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1989.Google Scholar
[HM]Howe, R. and Moore, C. C.. Asymptotic properties of unitary representations. J. Funct. Anal. 32 (1979), 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[J]Jacobson, N.. Lie Algebras. Dover, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
[K]Kirillov, A. A.. Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups. Russian Mathematical Surveys 17 (1962), 53–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[L]Lipsman, R.. Group Representations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 388. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[M1]Moore, C. C.. Ergodicity of flows on homogeneous spaces. Amer. J. Math. 88 (1966), 154–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[M2]Moore, C. C.. The Mautner phenomenon for general unitary representations. Pacific J. Math. 86 (1980), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[OW]Ornstein, D. and Weiss, B.. Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Analyse Math. 48 (1987), 1–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[PS]Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Ergodic elements of ergodic actions. Compositio Mathematica 23 (1971), 115–122.Google Scholar
[R]Ratner, M.. On Raghunathan's measure conjecture. Ann. Math. 134 (1991), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W]Wang, S. P.. On the Mautner phenomenon and groups with property (T). Amer. J. Math. 104 (1982), 1191–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Z]Zimmer, R.. Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar