Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:01:59.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ergodic fractal measures and dimension conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

HILLEL FURSTENBERG
HILLEL FURSTENBERG*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel (email: harry@math.huji.ac.il)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A linear map from one Euclidean space to another may map a compact set bijectively to a set of smaller Hausdorff dimension. For ‘homogeneous’ fractals (to be defined), there is a phenomenon of ‘dimension conservation’. In proving this we shall introduce dynamical systems whose states represent compactly supported measures in which progression in time corresponds to progressively increasing magnification. Application of the ergodic theorem will show that, generically, dimension conservation is valid. This ‘almost everywhere’ result implies a non-probabilistic statement for homogeneous fractals.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 28 , Issue 2: William Parry Memorial Volume , April 2008, pp. 405 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

[1]Doob, J. L.. Stochastic Processes. Wiley, New York, 1953.Google Scholar
[2]Furstenberg, H.. Intersections of Cantor sets and transversality of semigroups. Problems in Analysis (Princeton Mathematical Series, 31). Ed. R. C. Gunning. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
[3]Furstenberg, H. and Weiss, B.. Markov processes and Ramsey theory for trees, Special Issue on Ramsey Theory. Combin. Probab. Comput. 12 (2003), 548–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Maker, P. T.. The ergodic theorem for a sequence of functions. Duke Math. J. 6 (1940), 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar