Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:10:28.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fixed price of groups and percolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2012

RUSSELL LYONS
RUSSELL LYONS*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, 831 E. 3rd St., Bloomington, IN 47405-7106, USA (email: rdlyons@indiana.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We prove that for every finitely generated group Γ, at least one of the following holds: (1) Γ has fixed price; (2) each of its Cayley graphs G has infinitely many infinite clusters for some Bernoulli percolation on G.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2013, pp. 183 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

References

[1]Abért, M. and Weiss, B.. Bernoulli actions are weakly contained in any free action. Preprint, 2011, http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1103.1063.Google Scholar
[2]Benjamini, I., Lyons, R., Peres, Y. and Schramm, O.. Group-invariant percolation on graphs. Geom. Funct. Anal. 9 (1999), 29–66.Google Scholar
[3]Benjamini, I. and Schramm, O.. Percolation beyond Zd, many questions and a few answers. Electron. Commun. Probab. 1(8) (1996), 71–82 (electronic).Google Scholar
[4]van den Berg, J. and Keane, M.. On the continuity of the percolation probability function. Conference in Modern Analysis and Probability (New Haven, CT, 1982). Eds. Beals, R., Beck, A., Bellow, A. and Hajian, A.. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1984, pp. 61–65.Google Scholar
[5]Burton, R. M. and Keane, M.. Density and uniqueness in percolation. Comm. Math. Phys. 121 (1989), 501–505.Google Scholar
[6]Gaboriau, D.. Coût des relations d’équivalence et des groupes. Invent. Math. 139 (2000), 41–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gaboriau, D.. What is cost? Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 57 (2010), 1295–1296.Google Scholar
[8]Gandolfi, A., Keane, M. S. and Newman, C. M.. Uniqueness of the infinite component in a random graph with applications to percolation and spin glasses. Probab. Theory Related Fields 92 (1992), 511–527.Google Scholar
[9]Lyons, R.. Phase transitions on nonamenable graphs. J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000), 1099–1126, Probabilistic techniques in equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical physics.Google Scholar
[10]Newman, C. M. and Schulman, L. S.. Infinite clusters in percolation models. J. Stat. Phys. 26 (1981), 613–628.Google Scholar
[11]Pak, I. and Smirnova-Nagnibeda, T.. On non-uniqueness of percolation on nonamenable Cayley graphs. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 330 (2000), 495–500.Google Scholar