Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:46:09.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morse–Bott inequalities via a dynamical systems approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2009

AUGUSTIN BANYAGA  and
DAVID E. HURTUBISE
AUGUSTIN BANYAGA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA (email: banyaga@math.psu.edu)
DAVID E. HURTUBISE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Penn State Altoona, Altoona, PA 16601-3760, USA (email: Hurtubise@psu.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Let f:M→ℝ be a Morse–Bott function on a compact smooth finite-dimensional manifold M. The polynomial Morse inequalities and an explicit perturbation of f defined using Morse functions fj on the critical submanifolds Cj of f show immediately that MBt(f)=Pt(M)+(1+t)R(t), where MBt(f) is the Morse–Bott polynomial of f and Pt(M) is the Poincaré polynomial of M. We prove that R(t) is a polynomial with non-negative integer coefficients by showing that the number of gradient flow lines of the perturbation of f between two critical points p,q∈Cj of relative index one coincides with the number of gradient flow lines between p and q of the Morse function fj. This leads to a relationship between the kernels of the Morse–Smale–Witten boundary operators associated to the Morse functions fj and the perturbation of f. This method works when M and all the critical submanifolds are oriented or when ℤ2 coefficients are used.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 1693 - 1703
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

References

[1]Abbondandolo, A. and Majer, P.. Lectures on the Morse complex for infinite-dimensional manifolds. Morse Theoretic Methods in Nonlinear Analysis and in Symplectic Topology (NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, 217). Springer, Dordrecht, 2006, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
[2]Austin, D. M. and Braam, P. J.. Morse–Bott theory and equivariant cohomology. The Floer Memorial Volume (Progress in Mathematics, 133). Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995, pp. 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D.. Lectures on Morse Homology (Kluwer Texts in the Mathematical Sciences, 29). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D. E.. A proof of the Morse–Bott lemma. Expo. Math. 22 (2004), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Banyaga, A. and Hurtubise, D. E.. Morse–Bott homology, Preprint, arXiv:math.AT/0612316, 2006.Google Scholar
[6]Bismut, J.-M.. The Witten complex and the degenerate Morse inequalities. J. Differential Geom. 23 (1986), 207–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Bott, R.. Nondegenerate critical manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 60 (1954), 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Bott, R.. Lectures on Morse theory, old and new. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 7 (1982), 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Bott, R.. Morse theory indomitable. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 68 (1988), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Helffer, B. and Sjöstrand, J.. A proof of the Bott inequalities. Algebraic Analysis, Vol. I. Academic Press, Boston, 1988, pp. 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Henniart, G.. Les inégalités de Morse (d’après E. Witten). Astérisque (1985), 43–61, Séminaire Bourbaki, Vol. 1983/84.Google Scholar
[12]Jiang, M.-Y.. Morse homology and degenerate Morse inequalities. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 13 (1999), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Schwarz, M.. Morse Homology. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Witten, E.. Supersymmetry and Morse theory. J. Differential Geom. 17 (1982), 661–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar