Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:10:37.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-hyperbolic ergodic measures for non-hyperbolic homoclinic classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2009

LORENZO J. DÍAZ  and
ANTON GORODETSKI
LORENZO J. DÍAZ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, PUC-Rio, Marquês de S. Vicente 225, 22453-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil (email: lodiaz@mat.puc-rio.br)
ANTON GORODETSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA (email: asgor@math.uci.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We prove that there is a residual subset 𝒮 in Diff1(M) such that, for every f∈𝒮, any homoclinic class of f containing saddles of different indices (dimension of the unstable bundle) contains also an uncountable support of an invariant ergodic non-hyperbolic (one of the Lyapunov exponents is equal to zero) measure of f.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 1479 - 1513
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

References

[1]Abdenur, F., Bonatti, Ch. and Crovisier, S.. Nonuniform hyperbolicity for C 1-generic diffeomorphisms. Preprint.Google Scholar
[2]Abdenur, F., Bonatti, Ch., Crovisier, S. and Díaz, L. J.. Generic diffeomorphisms on compact surfaces. Fund. Math. 187 (2005), 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Abdenur, F., Bonatti, Ch., Crovisier, S., Díaz, L. J. and Wen, L.. Periodic points and homoclinic classes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26 (2006), 1–22.Google Scholar
[4]Abdenur, F. and Díaz, L. J.. Pseudo-orbit shadowing in the C 1-topology. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 17 (2007), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Abraham, R. and Smale, S.. Nongenericity of Ω-stability. Global Analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIV, Berkeley, CA, 1968). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1970, pp. 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Alves, J., Araújo, V. and Saussol, B.. On the uniform hyperbolicity of some nonuniformly hyperbolic systems. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 1303–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Aoki, N.. The set of Axiom A diffeomorphisms with no cycles. Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. (N.S.) 23 (1992), 21–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Baraviera, A. and Bonatti, Ch.. Removing zero Lyapunov exponents. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1655–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Bochi, J.. Genericity of zero Lyapunov exponents. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22 (2002), 1667–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Bochi, J. and Viana, M.. Uniform (projective) hyperbolicity or no hyperbolicity: a dichotomy for generic conservative maps. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 19 (2002), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Bonatti, Ch. and Crovisier, S.. Récurrence et généricité. Invent. Math. 158 (2004), 33–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Bonatti, Ch. and Díaz, L. J.. Nonhyperbolic transitive diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 143 (1996), 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Bonatti, Ch. and Díaz, L. J.. Connexions hétéroclines et genericité d’une infinité de puits ou de sources. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 32 (1999), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Bonatti, Ch. and Díaz, L. J.. On maximal transitive sets of generic diffeormophisms. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 96 (2002), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Bonatti, Ch. and Díaz, L. J.. Robust heterodimensional cycles. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 7(3) (2008), 469–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Bonatti, Ch., Díaz, L. J. and Fisher, T.. Super-exponential growth of the number of periodic orbits inside homoclinic classes. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20 (2008), 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Bonatti, Ch., Díaz, L. J. and Pujals, E. R.. A 𝒞1-generic dichotomy for diffeomorphisms: weak forms of hyperbolicicity or infinitely many sinks or sources. Ann. of Math. (2) 158 (2003), 355–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Bonatti, Ch., Díaz, L. J. and Turcat, G.. Pas de ‘Shadowing Lemma’ pour les dynamiques partiellement hyperboliques. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I Math. 330(7) (2000), 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Bonatti, Ch., Díaz, L. J. and Viana, M.. Discontinuity of the Hausdorff dimension of hyperbolic sets. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 320 (1995), 713–718.Google Scholar
[20]Bonatti, Ch., Díaz, L. J. and Viana, M.. Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences (Mathematical Physics), 102). Springer, Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar
[21]Bonatti, Ch. and Viana, M.. SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly contracting. Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 157–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Crovisier, S.. Periodic orbits and chain transitive sets of C 1-diffeomorphisms. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 104 (2006), 87–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Cao, Y.. Nonzero Lyapunov exponents and uniformly hyperbolicity. Nonlinearity 16 (2003), 1473–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Cao, Y., Luzzatto, S. and Rios, I.. Some non-hyperbolic systems with strictly non-zero Lyapunov exponents for all invariant measures: horseshoes with internal tangencies. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 15 (2006), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Cao, Y., Luzzatto, S. and Rios, I.. The boundary of hyperbolicity for Henon-like families. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(4) (2008), 1049–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Carballo, C., Morales, C. and Pacifico, M. J.. Homoclinic classes for generic C 1 vector fields. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Díaz, L. J.. Robust non-hyperbolic dynamics at heterodimensional cycles. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15 (1995), 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Dolgopyat, D. and Pesin, Ya.. Every compact manifold carries a completely hyperbolic diffeomorphism. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22 (2002), 409–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Díaz, L. J., Pujals, E. R. and Ures, R.. Partial hyperbolicity and robust transitivity. Acta Math. 183 (1999), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Franks, J.. Necessary conditions for stability of diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Gorodetski, A.. Regularity of central leaves of partially hyperbolic sets and its applications. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 70(6) (2006), 19–44  (Engl. transl. Izv. Math. 70(6) (2006), 1093–1116).Google Scholar
[32]Gorodetski, A. and Ilyashenko, Yu.. Some new robust properties of invariant sets and attractors of dynamical systems. Funct. Anal. Appl. 33 (1999), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Gorodetski, A. and Ilyashenko, Yu.. Some properties of skew products over the horseshoe and solenoid. Proc. Steklov Inst. 231 (2000), 96–118.Google Scholar
[34]Gorodetski, A., Ilyashenko, Yu., Kleptsyn, V. and Nalsky, M.. Nonremovable zero Lyapunov esponents. Funct. Anal. Appl. 39 (2005), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35]Gonchenko, S. V., Ovsyannikov, I. I., Simó, C. and Turaev, D. V.. Three-dimensional Hénon-like maps and wild Lorenz-like attractors. Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 15 (2005), 3493–3508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36]Gonchenko, S. V., Shilnikov, L. P. and Turaev, D. V.. On models with nonrough Poincaré homoclinic curves (Homoclinic chaos (Brussels, 1991)). Phys. D 62 (1993), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Hayashi, S.. Connecting invariant manifolds and the solution of the C 1-stability and Ω-stability conjectures for flows. Ann. of Math. (2) 145 (1997), 81–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38]Kaloshin, V.. Generic diffeomorphisms with superexponential growth of number of periodic points. Comm. Math. Phys. 211 (2000), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[39]Kleptsyn, V. and Nalsky, M.. Robustness of nonhyperbolic measures for C 1-diffeomorphisms. Funct. Anal. Appl. 41(4) (2007), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40]Katok, A. and Stepin, A.. Approximation of ergodic dynamical systems by periodic transformations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 171 (1966), 1268–1271.Google Scholar
[41]Katok, A. and Stepin, A.. Approximations in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[42]Liao, S. T.. Obstruction sets (II). Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin 2 (1981), 1–36.Google Scholar
[43]Mañé, R.. An ergodic closing lemma. Ann. of Math. (2) 116 (1982), 503–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[44]Mañé, R.. Ergodic Theory and Differentiable Dynamics (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge, Bd. 8). Springer, Berlin, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[45]Nalsky, M.. Non-hyperbolic invariant measures on a maximal attractor, Preprint (arXiv: 0807.4963).Google Scholar
[46]Newhouse, S.. Non-density of Axiom A(a) on S 2. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Symp. Pure Math. 14 (1970), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[47]Newhouse, S.. Hyperbolic Limit Sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 167 (1972), 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[48]Newhouse, S.. The abundance of wild hyperbolic sets and nonsmooth stable sets for diffeomorphisms. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 50 (1979), 101–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[49]Oseledec, V. I.. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Characteristic Lyapunov exponents of dynamical systems. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Ob. 19 (1968), 179–210 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[50]Palis, J.. A global view of dynamics and a conjecture on the denseness of finitude of attractors (Géométrie complexe et systémes dynamiques (Orsay, 1995)). Asterisque 261 (2000), 335–347.Google Scholar
[51]Pesin, Ya.. Characteristic Lyapunov exponents and smooth ergodic theory. Usp. Mat. Nauk 32 (1977), 55–112.Google Scholar
[52]Pujals, E. R. and Sambarino, M.. Homoclinic tangencies and hyperbolicity for surface diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 151 (2000), 961–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[53]Sakai, K.. C 1-stable shadowing chain components. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 28(3) (2008), 987–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[54]Shub, M. and Wilkinson, A.. Pathological foliations and removable zero exponents. Invent. Math. 139 (2000), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[55]Takens, F.. Heteroclinic attractors: time averages and moduli of topological conjugacy. Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. (N.S.) 25 (1994), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[56]Yang, J.. Ergodic measures far away from tangencies. PhD Thesis, IMPA.Google Scholar
[57]Yuan, G.-C. and Yorke, J. A.. An open set of maps for which every point is absolutely nonshadowable. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar