Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:19:50.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on Borel–Cantelli lemmas for non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2012

NICOLAI HAYDN ,
MATTHEW NICOL ,
TOMAS PERSSON  and
SANDRO VAIENTI
NICOLAI HAYDN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA (email: nhaydn@usc.edu)
MATTHEW NICOL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-3008, USA (email: nicol@math.uh.edu)
TOMAS PERSSON
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden (email: tomasp@maths.lth.se)
SANDRO VAIENTI
Affiliation:
UMR-6207 Centre de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Universités d’Aix-Marseille I, II, Université du Sud, Toulon-Var and FRUMAM, Fédéderation de Recherche des Unités de Mathématiques de Marseille, CPT, Luminy Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France (email: vaienti@cpt.univ-mrs.fr)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Let (Bi) be a sequence of measurable sets in a probability space (X,ℬ,μ) such that ∑ ∞n=1μ(Bi)=∞. The classical Borel–Cantelli lemma states that if the sets Bi are independent, then μ({x∈X:x∈Bi infinitely often})=1. Suppose (T,X,μ) is a dynamical system and (Bi) is a sequence of sets in X. We consider whether Tix∈Bi infinitely often for μ almost every x∈X and, if so, is there an asymptotic estimate on the rate of entry? If Tix∈Bi infinitely often for μ almost every x, we call the sequence (Bi)a Borel–Cantelli sequence. If the sets Bi :=B(p,ri)are nested balls of radius ri about a point p, then the question of whether Tix∈Bi infinitely often for μ almost every x is often called the shrinking target problem. We show, under certain assumptions on the measure μ, that for balls Bi if μ(Bi)≥i−γ, 0<γ<1, then a sufficiently high polynomial rate of decay of correlations for Lipschitz observables implies that the sequence is Borel–Cantelli. If μ(Bi)≥C1 /i, then exponential decay of correlations implies that the sequence is Borel–Cantelli. We give conditions in terms of return time statistics which quantify Borel–Cantelli results for sequences of balls such that μ(Bi)≥C/i. Corollaries of our results are that for planar dispersing billiards and Lozi maps, sequences of nested balls B(p,1/i) are Borel–Cantelli. We also give applications of these results to a variety of non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 475 - 498
Copyright
©2012 Cambridge University Press

References

[1]Bunimovich, L. A., Sinai, Ya. G. and Chernov, N. I.. Markov partitions for two-dimensional hyperbolic billiards. Russian Math. Surveys 45(3) (1990), 105–152.Google Scholar
[2]Bunimovich, L. A., Sinai, Ya. G. and Chernov, N. I.. Statistical properties of two-dimensional hyperbolic billiards. Russian Math. Surveys 46 (1991), 47–106.Google Scholar
[3]Chazottes, J.-R. and Collet, P.. Poisson approximation for the number of visits to balls in non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear.Google Scholar
[4]Chernov, N.. Decay of correlations in dispersing billiards. J. Stat. Phys. 94 (1999), 513–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chernov, N. and Kleinbock, D.. Dynamical Borel–Cantelli lemmas for Gibbs measures. Israel J. Math. 122 (2001), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Chernov, N. and Markarian, R.. Chaotic Billiards (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 127). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006.Google Scholar
[7]Collet, P.. Statistics of closest return for some non-uniformly hyperbolic systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21 (2001), 401–420.Google Scholar
[8]Collet, P. and Levy, Y.. Ergodic properties of the Lozi mappings. Comm. Math. Phys. 93 (1984), 461–481.Google Scholar
[9]Cristadoro, G., Haydn, N., Marie, P. and Vaienti, S.. Statistical properties of intermittent maps with unbounded derivative. Preprint.Google Scholar
[10]Dolgopyat, D.. Limit theorems for partially hyperbolic systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 1637–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Durrett, R.. Probability: Theory and Examples, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
[12]Fayad, B.. Two remarks on the shrinking target property. arXiv:math/0501205v1.Google Scholar
[13]Galatolo, S., Rousseau, J. and Saussol, B.. Skew products, quantitative recurrence, shrinking targets and decay of correlations. Preprint.Google Scholar
[14]Gouëzel, S.. A Borel–Cantelli lemma for intermittent interval maps. Nonlinearity 20(6) (2007), 1491–1497.Google Scholar
[15]Gupta, C.. Extreme value distributions for some classes of non-uniformly partially hyperbolic dynamical systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 30 (2010), 757–771.Google Scholar
[16]Gupta, C., Holland, M. and Nicol, M.. Extreme value theory and return time statistics for dispersing billiard maps and flows, Lozi maps and Lorenz-like maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 31(5) (2011), 1363–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Gupta, C., Nicol, M. and Ott, W.. A Borel–Cantelli lemma for non-uniformly expanding dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 23(8) (2010), 1991–2008.Google Scholar
[18]Haydn, N., Lacroix, Y. and Vaienti, S.. Hitting and return time statistics in ergodic dynamical systems. Ann. Probab. 33 (2005), 2043–2050.Google Scholar
[19]Hirata, M.. Poisson limit law for Axiom-A diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 13 (1993), 533–556.Google Scholar
[20]Holland, M. P., Nicol, M. and Török, A.. Extreme value distributions for non-uniformly hyperbolic dynamical systems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2011), 661–688.Google Scholar
[21]Katok, A. and Strelcyn, J.-M.. Invariant Manifolds, Entropy and Billiards; Smooth Maps with Singularities (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1222). Springer, New York, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Kim, D.. The dynamical Borel–Cantelli lemma for interval maps. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 17(4) (2007), 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Liverani, C., Saussol, B. and Vaienti, S.. A probabilistic approach to intermittency. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 19(3) (1999), 671–685.Google Scholar
[24]Maucourant, F.. Dynamical Borel–Cantelli lemma for hyperbolic spaces. Israel J. Math. 152 (2006), 143–155.Google Scholar
[25]Misiurewicz, M.. Strange attractors for the Lozi mappings. Non Linear Dynamics. Ed. Helleman, R. G.. The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[26]Phillipp, W.. Some metrical theorems in number theory. Pacific J. Math. 20 (1967), 109–127.Google Scholar
[27]Rudin, W.. Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
[28]Schmidt, W.. A metrical theory in diophantine approximation. Canad. J. Math. 12 (1960), 619–631.Google Scholar
[29]Schmidt, W.. Metrical theorems on fractional parts of sequences. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 110 (1964), 493–518.Google Scholar
[30]Sprindzuk, V. G.. Metric Theory of Diophantine Approximations. V. H. Winston, Washington, DC, 1979, Translated from the Russian and edited by R. A. Silverman, with a foreword by D. J. Newman, Scripta Series in Mathematics; MR∼548467∼(80k:10048).Google Scholar
[31]Thaler, M.. Estimates of the invariant densities of endomorphisms with indifferent fixed points. Israel J. Math. 3 (1980), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Young, L.-S.. Statistical properties of dynamical systems with some hyperbolicity. Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 585–650.Google Scholar