Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:47:13.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the self-similarity problem for smooth flows on orientable surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2011

JOANNA KUŁAGA
JOANNA KUŁAGA*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Chopina 12/18, 87-100 Toruń, Poland (email: joanna.kulaga@gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

On each compact connected orientable surface of genus greater than one we construct a class of flows without self-similarities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 1615 - 1660
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

[1]Ageev, O. N.. Nonsingular α-rigid maps. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 15(4) (2009), 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arnol’d, V. I.. Topological and ergodic properties of closed 1-forms with incommensurable periods. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 25(2) (1991), 1–12, 96.Google Scholar
[3]Boshernitzan, M.. A condition for minimal interval exchange maps to be uniquely ergodic. Duke Math. J. 52(3) (1985), 723–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cornfeld, I. P., Fomin, S. V. and Sinaĭ, Ya. G.. Ergodic Theory (Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 245). Springer, New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Frączek, K. and Lemańczyk, M.. On the self-similarity problem for ergodic flows. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 99(3) (2009), 658–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Frączek, K. and Lemańczyk, M.. On symmetric logarithm and some old examples in smooth ergodic theory. Fund. Math. 180(3) (2003), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Frączek, K. and Lemańczyk, M.. On disjointness properties of some smooth flows. Fund. Math. 185(2) (2005), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Frączek, K. and Lemańczyk, M.. On mild mixing of special flows over irrational rotations under piecewise smooth functions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(3) (2006), 719–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Furstenberg, H.. Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Systems Theory 1 (1967), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Helson, H. and Parry, W.. Cocycles and spectra. Ark. Mat. 16(2) (1978), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Katok, A. and Thouvenot, J.-P.. Spectral properties and combinatorial constructions in ergodic theory. Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1B. Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 649–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Katok, A. B.. Interval exchange transformations and some special flows are not mixing. Israel J. Math. 35(4) (1980), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Keane, M.. Interval exchange transformations. Math. Z. 141 (1975), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Kochergin, A. V.. Nonsingular saddle points and the absence of mixing. Mat. Zametki 19(3) (1976), 453–468 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[15]Marcus, B.. The horocycle flow is mixing of all degrees. Invent. Math. 46(3) (1978), 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Marmi, S., Moussa, P. and Yoccoz, J.-C.. The cohomological equation for Roth-type interval exchange maps. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18(4) (2005), 823–872 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Mayer, A.. Trajectories on the closed orientable surfaces. Rec. Math. [Mat. Sbornik] N.S. 12(54) (1943), 71–84.Google Scholar
[18]Rauzy, G.. Échanges d’intervalles et transformations induites. Acta Arith. 34(4) (1979), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Ryzhikov, V. V.. On a connection between the mixing properties of a flow with an isomorphism entering into its transformations. Mat. Zametki 49(6) (1991), 98–106, 159.Google Scholar
[20]Ryzhikov, V. V.. Stochastic intertwinings and multiple mixing of dynamical systems. J. Dynam. Control Systems 2(1) (1996), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Ryzhikov, V. V.. Wreath products of tensor products, and a stochastic centralizer of dynamical systems. Mat. Sb. 188(2) (1997), 67–94.Google Scholar
[22]Danilenko, A. I. and Ryzhikov, V. V.. On self-similarities of ergodic flows. Preprint, 2010, arXiv:1011.0343.Google Scholar
[23]Sinai, Ya. G. and Ulcigrai, C.. Weak mixing in interval exchange transformations of periodic type. Lett. Math. Phys. 74(2) (2005), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ulcigrai, C.. Absence of mixing in area-preserving flows on surfaces. Ann. of Math. (2) 173(3) (2011), 1743–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Veech, W. A.. Projective Swiss cheeses and uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformations. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, I (College Park, Md., 1979–80) (Progress in Mathematics, 10). Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1981, pp. 113–193.Google Scholar
[26]Veech, W. A.. Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps. Ann. of Math. (2) 115(1) (1982), 201–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Veršik, A. M.. Multivalued mappings with invariant measure (polymorphisms) and Markov operators. Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 72 (1977), 26–61, 223 (in Russian) (Engl. Transl. Many-valued measure-preserving mappings (polymorphisms) and Markovian operators. J. Math. Sci. 23(3) (1983), 2243–2266).Google Scholar
[28]Zorich, A.. Hamiltonian flows of multivalued hamiltonians on closed orientable surfaces. Unpublished, 1994. Available at http://www.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/preblob/4964.Google Scholar
[29]Zorich, A.. Finite Gauss measure on the space of interval exchange transformations. Lyapunov exponents. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 46(2) (1996), 325–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Zorich, A.. Deviation for interval exchange transformations. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 17(6) (1997), 1477–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar