Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:36:46.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One point intersections of middle-α Cantor sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Roger L. Kraft
Roger L. Kraft
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, Purdue University-Calumet Hammond, IN 46323, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For α ∈ (0, 1), let Γα denote the middle-α Cantor set contained in the interval [0,1]. Let denote the set of all t∈[−1,1] such that Γα ∩(Γα+t)is a single point. Both a geometric and a symbolic description of each is presented. The symbolic description of each will be as a shift invariant subset of the one-sided two shift that is determined by inequalities. An equivalence relation is defined on the one-sided two shift and then a linear order relation is defined on the equivalence classes. This order relation on the equivalence classes describes how the sets shrink as a decreases from ⅓ to 0.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 537 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[HKY]Hunt, B.R., Kan, I. and Yorke, J.A.. When Cantor sets intersect thickly. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 339 (1993), 869–888.Google Scholar
[K1]Kraft, R.L.. Intersections of thick Cantor sets. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 97 (1992), no. 468.Google Scholar
[K2]Kraft, R.L.. What's the difference between Cantor sets? The Amer. Math. Monthly to appear.Google Scholar
[N1]Newhouse, S.E.. The abundance of wild hyperbolic sets and non-smooth stable sets for diffeomorphisms. Publ. Math. IHES 50 (1979), 101–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N2]Newhouse, S.E.. Lectures on dynamical systems. Dynamical Systems, C.I.ME. Lectures, Bressanone, Italy, June, 1978. Progress in Mathematics, No. 8. Birkhauser: Boston, 1980, pp. 1–114.Google Scholar
[PT]Palis, J. and Takens, F.. Hyperbolicity and the creation of homoclinic orbits. Ann. Math. 125 (1987), 337–374.Google Scholar
[W1]Williams, R.F.. Geometric theory of dynamical systems. Workshop on dynamical systems. (Coelho, Z., ed.). Proc. Conf. International Centre for Theoretical Physics (Trieste, 1988). Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series 221. Longman: New York, 1990, pp. 67–75.Google Scholar
[W2]Williams, R.F.. How big is the intersection of two thick Cantor sets? Continuum theory and dynamical systems (Brown, M., ed.). Proc. Joint Summer Research Conference on Continua and Dynamics (Arcata, California, 1989). Amer. Math. Soc.: Providence, RI, 1991.Google Scholar