Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T07:38:46.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rank two interval exchange transformations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Michael D. Boshernitzan
Michael D. Boshernitzan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We consider interval exchange transformations T for which the lengths of the exchanged intervals have linear rank 2 over the field of rationals. We prove that, for such T, minimality implies unique ergodicity. We also provide an algorithm which tests T for aperiodicity and minimality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 379 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

REFERENCES

[1]Boshernitzan, M.. A condition for minimal interval exchange maps to be uniquely ergodic. Duke Math. J. 52 (1985), 723–752.Google Scholar
[2]Boshernitzan, M.. A unique ergodicity of minimal symbolic flows with linear block growth. J. d'Analyse Math. 44 (1985), 77–96.Google Scholar
[3]Cornfeld, I. P., Fomin, S. V. & Sinai, Ya. G.. Ergodic Theory Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
[4]Galperin, G. A.. Two constructive sufficient conditions for aperiodicity of interval exchange, (Russian) Theoretical and Applied Problems of Optimization 176, 8–16, Nauka: Moscow, 1985.Google Scholar
[5]Katok, A.. Invariant measures of flows on oriented surfaces. Dokl. Nauk. SSR 211 (1973),Google Scholar
Sov. Math. Dokl. 14 (1973), 1104–1108.Google Scholar
[6]Keane, M.. Interval exchange transformations. Math. Z. 141 (1975), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Keane, M.. Non-ergodic interval exchange transformation. Israel J. Math. 2 (1977), 188–196.Google Scholar
[8]Keynes, H. and Newton, D.. A minimal, non-uniquely ergodic interval exchange transformation. Math. Z. 148 (1976), 101–105.Google Scholar
[9]Masur, H.. Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations. Ann. of Math. 115 (1982), 168–200.Google Scholar
[10]Sataev, E. A.. On the number of invariant measures for flows on orientable surfaces. Math. of the USSR, Izvestija 9 (1975), 813–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Veech, W. A.. Strict ergodicity in zero dimensional dynamical systems and the Kronecker-Weyl theorem mod 2. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1969), 1–33.Google Scholar
[12]Veech, W. A.. Finite group extensions of irrational rotations. Israel J. Math. 21 (1975), m 240–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Veech, W. A.. Interval exchange transformations, J. D'Analyse Math. 33 (1978), 222–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Veech, W. A.. Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps. Ann. of Math. 15 (1982), 201–242.Google Scholar
[15]Veech, W. A.. Boshernitzan's criterion for unique ergodicity of an interval exchange transformation. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. (1987), 7, 149–153.Google Scholar