Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T19:47:54.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological and symbolic dynamics for hyperbolic systems with holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2010

STEFAN BUNDFUSS,
TYLL KRÜGER and
SERGE TROUBETZKOY
STEFAN BUNDFUSS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany (email: bundfuss@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de)
TYLL KRÜGER
Affiliation:
FB Mathematik, Technische Universität Berlin and Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, Germany (email: tkrueger@math.tu-berlin.de)
SERGE TROUBETZKOY
Affiliation:
Centre de Physique Théorique, Fédération de Recherche des Unités Mathématiques de Marseille, Institut de Mathématiques de Luminy, and Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France (email: troubetz@iml.univ-mrs.fr)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We consider an axiom A diffeomorphism or a Markov map of an interval and the invariant set Ω* of orbits which never falls into a fixed hole. We study various aspects of the symbolic representation of Ω* and of its non-wandering set Ωnw. Our results are on the cardinality of the set of topologically transitive components of Ωnw and their structure. We also prove that Ω* is generically a subshift of finite type in several senses.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2011, pp. 1305 - 1323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

[1]van den Bedem, H. and Chernov, N.. Expanding maps of an interval with holes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22 (2002), 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blanchard, F.. β-shifts and symbolic dynamics. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 65 (1989), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Blanchard, F. and Hansel, G.. Systèmes codés. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 44 (1986), 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Blanchard, F. and Hansel, G.. Sofic constant-to-one extensions of subshifts of finite type. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1991), 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bruin, H., Demers, M. and Melbourne, I.. Existence and convergence properties of physical measures for certain dynamical systems with holes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys 30(3) (2010), 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bunimovich, L. and Yurchenko, A.. Where to place a hole to achieve a maximal escape rate, 2008, arXiv:0811.4438.Google Scholar
[7]de Carvalho, A.. Pruning fronts and the formation of horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 19 (1999), 851–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chernov, N. and Markarian, R.. Ergodic properties of Anosov maps with rectangular holes. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat. 28 (1997), 271–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Chernov, N. and Markarian, R.. Anosov maps with rectangular holes. Nonergodic cases. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat. 28 (1997), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Chernov, N., Markarian, R. and Troubetzkoy, S.. Conditionally invariant measures for Anosov maps with small holes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 18 (1998), 1049–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Chernov, N., Markarian, R. and Troubetzkoy, S.. Invariant measures for Anosov maps with small holes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 20 (2000), 1007–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Collet, P., Martinez, S. and Schmitt, B.. The Yorke–Pianigiani measure and the asymptotic law on the limit Cantor set of expanding systems. Nonlinearity 7 (1994), 1437–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Cvitanović, P.. Dynamical averaging in terms of periodic orbits. Phys. D 83 (1995), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Demers, M., Wright, P. and Young, L.-S.. Escape rates and physically relevant measures for billiards with small holes. Comm. Math. Phys. 294(2) (2010), 353–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Demers, M. and Young, L.-S.. Escape rates and conditionally invariant measures. Nonlinearity 19 (2006), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Demers, M.. Markov extensions and conditionally invariant measures for certain logistic maps with small holes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 25 (2005), 1139–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Demers, M.. Markov extensions for dynamical systems with holes: an application to expanding maps of the interval. Israel J. Math. 146 (2005), 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Falconer, K.. The Geometry of Fractal Sets (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 85). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Gaspard, P. and Dorfman, J.. Chaotic scattering theory, thermodynamic formalism, and transport coefficients. Phys. Rev. E 52 (1995), 3525–3552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[20]Keller, G. and Liverani, C.. Rare events, escape rates and quasistationarity: some exact formulae. J. Stat. Phys. 135 (2009), 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Lind, D. and Marcus, B.. Symbolic Dynamics and Coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Liverani, C. and Maume-Deschamps, V.. Lasota–Yorke maps with holes: conditionally invariant probability measures and invariant probability measures on the survivor set. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 39 (2003), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Lopes, A. and Markarian, R.. Open billiards: Cantor sets, invariant and conditionally invariant prbabilities. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 56 (1996), 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Pianigiani, G. and Yorke, J.. Expanding maps on sets which are almost invariant: decay and chaos. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 252 (1979), 351–366.Google Scholar
[25]Ruelle, D.. Entropy production in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys. 189 (1997), 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar