Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:19:41.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of active control techniquesover a dihedral plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2002

Emmanuel Creusé*
Affiliation:
M.A.C.S., Université de Valenciennes, le Mont Houy, 59313 Valenciennes Cedex 9, France; ecreuse@univ-valenciennes.fr.M.A.B., Université Bordeaux 1, 33405 Talence, France.
Get access

Abstract

This work is devoted to the numerical comparison of four active control techniques in order to increase the pressure recovery generated by thedeceleration of a slightly compressible viscous flow over a dihedral plane. It is performed by theuse of vortex generator jets and intrusive sensors. The governing equations,the two-dimensional direct numerical simulation code and the flow configuration are first briefly recalled. Then, the objective of thecontrol is carefully displayed, and the uncontrolled flow described. The main part of this work deals with the explanation, the implementation andthe comparison of four active control strategies: closed loop control,adaptative control, physical ramp control and sub-optimalcontrol. Each of these techniques is of different nature,and results are very formative to understand what is important– or less – to make the control efficient.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable