Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T04:16:27.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is it wise to keep laminating?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2004

Marc Briane
Affiliation:
Centre de Mathématique, INSA de Rennes & IRMAR, 20 avenue des Buttes de Coësmes, 35043 Rennes Cedex, France; mbriane@insa-rennes.fr.
Vincenzo Nesi
Affiliation:
Dip. di Mat., Universitá di Roma, La Sapienza P.le A. Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy; nesi@mat.uniroma1.it.
Get access

Abstract

We study the corrector matrix $P^{\varepsilon}$  to the conductivity equations. We showthat if $P^{\varepsilon}$  converges weakly to the identity, then for any laminate $\det P^{\varepsilon}\geq 0$ at almost every point. This simple property is shown to be false forgeneric microgeometries if the dimension is greater than two in the work Briane et al. [Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., to appear].In two dimensions it holds true for any microgeometry as a corollary of the work in Alessandrini and Nesi [Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.158 (2001) 155-171]. We use this property of laminates to prove that, in any dimension, the classicalHashin-Shtrikman bounds are not attained by laminates, in certain regimes, when the number ofphases is greater than two. In addition we establish new bounds for the effective conductivity,which are asymptotically optimal for mixtures of three isotropic phases among a certain class ofmicrogeometries, including orthogonal laminates, which we then call quasiorthogonal.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable