Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:24:00.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How many bins should be put in a regularhistogram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2006

Lucien Birgé  and
Yves Rozenholc
Lucien Birgé
Affiliation:
UMR 7599 “Probabilités et modèles aléatoires", Laboratoire de Probabilités, boîte 188, Université Paris VI, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France; lb@ccr.jussieu.fr;
Yves Rozenholc
Affiliation:
MAP5-UMR CNRS 8145, Université Paris 5, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France; yves.rozenholc@math-info.univ.paris5.fr
Get access

Abstract

Given an n-sample from some unknown density f on [0,1], it is easy to construct anhistogram of the data based on some given partition of [0,1], but not so much is knownabout an optimal choice of the partition, especially when the data set is not large, even ifone restricts to partitions into intervals of equal length. Existing methods are either rulesof thumbs or based on asymptotic considerations and often involve some smoothnessproperties of f. Our purpose in this paper is to give an automatic, easy to program andefficient method to choose the number of bins of the partition from the data. It is based on boundson the risk of penalized maximum likelihood estimators due to Castellan and heavy simulationswhich allowed us to optimize the form of the penalty function. These simulations show that themethod works quite well for sample sizes as small as 25.

Keywords

Regular histogramsdensity estimationpenalized maximum likelihoodmodel selection.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ESAIM: Probability and Statistics , Volume 10 , February 2006 , pp. 24 - 45
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akaike, H., A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (1974) 716–723. CrossRef
Barron, A.R., Birgé, L. and Massart, P.. Risk bounds for model selection via penalization. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 113 (1999) 301–415. CrossRef
L. Birgé and P. Massart, From model selection to adaptive estimation, in Festschrift for Lucien Le Cam: Research Papers in Probability and Statistics, D. Pollard, E. Torgersen and G. Yang, Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York (1997) 55–87.
Birgé, L. and Massart, P., Gaussian model selection. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 3 (2001) 203–268.
G. Castellan, Modified Akaike's criterion for histogram density estimation. Technical Report. Université Paris-Sud, Orsay (1999).
Castellan, G., Sélection d'histogrammes à l'aide d'un critère de type Akaike. CRAS 330 (2000) 729–732.
J. Daly, The construction of optimal histograms. Commun. Stat., Theory Methods 17 (1988) 2921–2931.
L. Devroye, A Course in Density Estimation. Birkhäuser, Boston (1987).
L. Devroye, and L. Györfi, Nonparametric Density Estimation: The L 1 View. John Wiley, New York (1985).
L. Devroye and G. Lugosi, Combinatorial Methods in Density Estimation. Springer-Verlag, New York (2001).
Freedman, D. and Diaconis, P., On the histogram as a density estimator: L 2 theory. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verw. Geb. 57 (1981) 453–476. CrossRef
Hall, P., Akaike's information criterion and Kullback-Leibler loss for histogram density estimation. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 85 (1990) 449–467. CrossRef
Hall, P. and Hannan, E.J., On stochastic complexity and nonparametric density estimation. Biometrika 75 (1988) 705–714. CrossRef
He, K. and Meeden, G., Selecting the number of bins in a histogram: A decision theoretic approach. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 61 (1997) 49–59. CrossRef
D.R.M. Herrick, G.P. Nason and B.W. Silverman, Some new methods for wavelet density estimation. Sankhya, Series A 63 (2001) 394–411.
Jones, M.C., On two recent papers of Y. Kanazawa. Statist. Probab. Lett. 24 (1995) 269–271. CrossRef
Kanazawa, Y., Hellinger distance and Akaike's information criterion for the histogram. Statist. Probab. Lett. 17 (1993) 293–298. CrossRef
L.M. Le Cam, Asymptotic Methods in Statistical Decision Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York (1986).
L.M. Le Cam and G.L. Yang, Asymptotics in Statistics: Some Basic Concepts. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York (2000).
Rissanen, J., Stochastic complexity and the MDL principle. Econ. Rev. 6 (1987) 85–102. CrossRef
Rudemo, M., Empirical choice of histograms and kernel density estimators. Scand. J. Statist. 9 (1982) 65–78.
Scott, D.W., On optimal and databased histograms. Biometrika 66 (1979) 605–610. CrossRef
Sturges, H.A., The choice of a class interval. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 21 (1926) 65–66. CrossRef
Taylor, C.C., Akaike's information criterion and the histogram. Biometrika. 74 (1987) 636–639. CrossRef
Terrell, G.R., The maximal smoothing principle in density estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85 (1990) 470–477. CrossRef
Wand, M.P., Data-based choice of histogram bin width. Am. Statistician 51 (1997) 59–64.