Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:44:50.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inverting the Large Lecture Class: Active Learning in an Introductory International Relations Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Daniel Lambach,
Caroline Kärger and
Achim Goerres
Daniel Lambach*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
Caroline Kärger*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
Achim Goerres*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
*
E-mail: daniel.lambach@uni-due.de
E-mail: caroline.kaerger@uni-due.de
E-mail: achim.goerres@uni-due.de
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inverted classroom model (ICM) is an active learning approach that reserves class meetings for hands-on exercises while shifting content learning to the preparatory stage. The ICM offers possibilities for pursuing higher-order learning objectives even in large classes. However, there are contradicting reports about students’ reactions to this kind of teaching innovation. With the ICM making inroads in political science teaching, this paper discusses how students evaluate this method. We report results from an application of the ICM to an introductory international relations course. In our course, students’ reactions to the ICM varied greatly. Using a regression analysis of student evaluation scores, we find that students’ preference for collaborative learning best predicted their preference for the ICM over the traditional lecture format.

Keywords

inverted classroomflipped classroomlectureactive learningblended learning

Information

Type
Teaching and Training
Information
European Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2017, pp. 553 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Corresponding author.

References

Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C. and Norman, M.K. (2010) How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Andonova, L.B. and Mendoza-Castro, R. (2008) ‘The next climate treaty? Pedagogical and policy lessons of classroom negotiations’, International Studies Perspectives 9(3): 331-347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, S. and Galloway, R. (2012). ‘The Inverted Classroom in a Large Enrolment Introductory Physics Course: A Case Study.’ Paper presented at the Higher Education Academy STEM Conference, 12-13 April 2012, London UK,Google Scholar
Biggs, J.B. (2014) Constructive alignment, available at http://www.johnbiggs.com.au/academic/constructive-alignment/, accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (2015) ‘Similar or different?: A comparative analysis of higher education research in political science and international relations betweeen the United States of America and United Kingdom’, Journal of Political Science Education 11(2): 174-189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, D. (1998) What’s the Use of Lectures?, Exeter: Intellect.Google Scholar
Burch, K. (2000) ‘A primer on problem-based learning for international relations courses’, International Studies Perspectives 1(1): 31-44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, M.C. (2010) Using YouTube to Enhance Student Class Preparation in an Introductory Java Course. in Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’ 10); 10-13 March 2010; Milwaukee, USA. New York: ACM, pp. 470–474.Google Scholar
Cieliebak, M. (2014) Einfluss von Flipped Classroom auf Fachwissen und Kompetenzen von Studierenden. Zusammenfassung einer Studie der Pädagogischen Hochschule Zürich 2014, available at http://engineering.zhaw.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/engineering/news/2014/Flipped_Classroom_Studie_der_PHZH_-_Zusammenfassung_-_ZHAW_School_of_Engineering.pdf, accessed at 25 March 2015.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.L. and Robinson, P. (2000) ‘The argument for making large classes seem small’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 81 5-16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, H.C. and Mazur, E. (2001) ‘Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results’, American Journal of Physics 69(9): 970-977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felder, R.M. (2011) ‘HANG IN THERE! Dealing with student resistance to learner-centered teaching’, Chemical Engineering Education 45(2): 131-132 Google Scholar
Goerres, A., Kärger, C. and Lambach, D. (2015) ‘Aktives Lernen in der Massenveranstaltung: Flipped-Classroom-Lehre als Alternative zur klassischen Vorlesung in der Politikwissenschaft’, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 25(1): 137-154 Google Scholar
Golich, V.L. (2000) ‘The ABCs of case teaching’, International Studies Perspectives 1(1): 11-29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasha, A.F. (1984) ‘Learning styles: The journey from Greenwich Observatory (1796) to the College Classroom (1984)’, Improving College and University Teaching 32(1): 46-53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J. (2009) Visible Learning. A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huerta, J.C. (2007) ‘Getting active in the large lecture’, Journal of Political Science Education 3(3): 237-249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2015) ‘Flipping the introductory American politics class: Student perceptions of the flipped classroom’, PS. Political Science & Politics 48(4): 607-611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J.L., Kummer, T.A. and Godoy, P. (2015) ‘Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning’, CBE: Life Sciences Education 14(1): 1-12 Google ScholarPubMed
Kärger, C., Lambach, D. (2015) ‘Kompetenzorientierte Gruppenprüfungen’, in Sera, S. and Ruschin, S. (eds.) Neu gedacht und neu gemacht. Lehrideen aus der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg: Zentrum für Hochschuldidaktik und Qualitätsentwicklung (ZfH) der Universität Duisburg-Essen, pp. 136-139 Google Scholar
Lage, J.M., Platt, J.G. and Treglia, M. (2000) ‘Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment’, Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30-43 Google Scholar
Lantis, J.S., Kuzma, L.M. and Boehrer, J. (2000) The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N. and Swift, A.W. (2013) ‘Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course’, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 45(3): 317-324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, F.T. (1981) ‘The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students’, in Anderson, A. (ed.) Mainstreaming Digest, College Park: University of Maryland Press, pp. 109-113 Google Scholar
Margulieux, L., Bujak, K., McCracken, M. and Majerich, D. (2014) Hybrid, Blended, Flipped, and Inverted: Defining Terms in a Two Dimensional Taxonomy Paper presented at the 12th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education, 5-9 January 2014, Honolulu, USA.Google Scholar
Mazur, E. (1997) Peer Instruction. A User’s Manual, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, E., Watkins, J. (2010) ‘Just-in-Time Teaching and Peer Instruction’, in Simkins, S. and Maier, M. (eds.) Just in Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy, Sterling: Virgina Stylus Publishing, pp. 39-61 Google Scholar
Meyer, P. (2014) ‘Blending Service Learning and E-Learning Elements in Higher Education: Experiences with a Variation of the Inverted Classroom Model’, in E.-M. Großkurth and J. Handke (eds.) The Inverted Classroom Model: The 3rd ICM Conference Proceedings, Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, pp. 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, C. (2013) ‘Activating Students by Inverting and Shuffling the Classroom’, in J. Handke (eds.) The 2nd German ICM Conference Proceedings, München: Oldenbourg, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N. and O’Dowd, D.K. (2010) ‘Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class’, CBE: Life Sciences Education 9(4): 473-481 Google Scholar
Niggemann, W. (1977) Praxis der Erwachsenenbildung, Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Omelicheva, M.Y. and Avdeyeva, O. (2008) ‘Teaching with lecture or debate? Testing the effectiveness of traditional versus active learning methods of instruction’, PS: Political Science and Politics 41(3): 603-607 Google Scholar
Pollock, P.H., Hamann, K. and Wilson, B.M. (2011) ‘Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings’, Journal of Political Science Education 7(1): 48-64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powner, C.L. and Allendoerfer, G.M. (2008) ‘Evaluating hypotheses about active learning’, International Studies Perspectives 9(1): 75-89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammel, T., Kärger, C. and Lambach, D. (2015) The Inverted Classroom: A Bibliography, available at http://www.hochschullehre-politik.de/2016/02/06/the-inverted-classroom-a-bibliography/, accessed 19 July 2016.Google Scholar
Reichmann, S.W. and Grasha, A.F. (1974) ‘A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning scale instrument’, Journal of Psychology 87(2): 213-223 Google Scholar
Roscoe, D.D. (2012) ‘Comparing student outcomes in blended and face-to-face courses’, Journal of Political Science Education 8(1): 1-19 Google Scholar
Sams, A. (2012) ‘Der Flipped Classroom’, in Handke, J. and Sperl, A. (eds.) Das Inverted Classroom Model: Begleitband zur ersten deutschen ICM-Konferenz, München: Oldenbourg, pp. 13-22 Google Scholar
Simkins, P.S. (1999) ‘Promoting active-student learning using the world wide web in economics courses’, Journal of Economic Education 30(3): 278-287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.J. (2013) ‘Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom’, Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14(4): 607-614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.K., Guild, N. and Su, T.T. (2009) ‘Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions’, Science 323(5910): 122-124 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starkey, B.A. and Blake, E.L. (2001) ‘Simulation in international relations education’, Simulation & Gaming 32(4): 537-551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. (2011): Thoughts on the culture of an inverted classroom, available at http://chronicle.com/blognetwork/castingoutnines/2011/05/25/thoughts-on-the-culture-of-an-inverted-classroom/, accessed 02 June 2015.Google Scholar
Touchton, M. (2015) ‘Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics: Evidence from a quasi-experiment’, Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 28-44 Google Scholar
Welsh, J.A. (2012) ‘Exploring Undergraduates’ perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures’, Research and Teaching 42(2): 80-87 Google Scholar
Wilson, S.G. (2013) ‘The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course’, Teaching of Psychology 40(3): 193-199 Google Scholar