Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T09:33:57.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the shoulders of giants: restoring the normative afflatus of political science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Giliberto Capano Open the ORCID record for Giliberto Capano [Opens in a new window]
Giliberto Capano*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Strada Maggiore 45, 40125 Bologna, Italy
*
giliberto.capano@unibo.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is no doubt that political science has always been characterised by a normative afflatus. Verba was deeply concerned with understanding how democracy works in practice and how it can survive over the course of time. Lasswell constantly argued that political science should focus on problem-solving in order to improve the quality of citizens’ lives. David Easton clearly indicated that political science ought to focus on major problems that must be immediately addressed. For Sartori, political science should be conducted for society’s sake and should produce useful and applicable knowledge; for Ostrom and Putnam, it should help citizens; and for Katznelson, it should focus on how to pursue “a more decent politics and society under dangerous and difficult conditions”. For many reasons internal and external to the discipline, these normative roots and goals have been forgotten in recent decades. It is time to restore the normative afflatus of political science by pushing it to become more normative-based, more solution-seeking, more engaged and more critical.

Keywords

The state of political sciencePublic engagementSocial impactNormative mission

Information

Type
Debate
Information
European Political Science , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2025 , pp. 388 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © 2025 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This note originates from a joint research effort over the last few years with Luca Verzichelli, who authored with me The Fate of Political Scientists in Europe, Palgrave, London, 2023

References

Brans, M., and Timmermans, A., eds. 2022. The advisory roles of political scientists in europe: Comparing engagements in policy advisory systems. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-86005-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairney, P. 2016. The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Capano, G., and Malandrino, A. 2022. Mapping the use of knowledge in policymaking: Barriers and facilitators from a subjectivist perspective (1990–2020). Policy Sciences 55 (3): 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., and Verzichelli, L. 2023. The Fate of Political Scientists in Europe: From Myth to Action. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-24643-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., M. Casula, A. Malandrino, A. Terlizzi, and F. Toth. 2024. A new typology for comparing scientific advisory committees. Evidence from the Italian: response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Policy Research 41 (5): 740–769.10.1111/ropr.12568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Easton, D. 1969. The new revolution in political science. American Political Science Review 63 (4): 1051–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, M. 2013. The tyranny of relevance and the art of translation. Political Studies Review 11 (2): 149–167.10.1111/1478-9302.12011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, M., and Pal, L. 2020. The moral foundations of public engagement: Does political science, as a discipline, have an ethics?. Political Studies Review 18 (2): 263–276.10.1177/1478929919881332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P. 2013. Political science, impact and evidence. Political Studies Review 11 (2): 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungblut, J., Gouglas, A., Katz, G. et al. (2023). Out of the ivory tower: an explanation of the policy advisory roles of political scientists in Europe. European Political Science, early view 1 August.Google Scholar
Katznelson, I. 2007. APSA presidential address: At the court of chaos: Political science in an age of perpetual fear. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, H.D. 1963. The future of political science. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, american political science association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhurst, J. 2017. The Politics of Evidence: From evidence—based policy to the good governance of evidence. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. 2003. APSA presidential address: the public role of political science. Perspectives on Politics 1 (2): 249–255.10.1017/S1537592703000185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, D. 1984. The tragedy of political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 2004. Where is political science going?. PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (4): 785.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. 2010. Blockages on the road to relevance: Why has political science failed to deliver. European Political Science 9 (1): 72–85.10.1057/eps.2010.37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, G. 2013. Designing politics: A neglected justification for political science. Political Studies Review 11 (2): 174–181.10.1111/1478-9302.12013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, G., Peters, B.G., and Pierre, J., eds. 2015. The relevance of political science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-50660-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trent, J. 2011. Should political science be more relevant? An empirical and critical analysis of the discipline. European Political Science 10 (2): 91–109.10.1057/eps.2010.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, S. 1960. Political behavior and politics. World Politics 12 (2): 280–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, C. 1979. Using social research in public policy making. Lexington Books.Google Scholar