Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T11:13:06.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Interest Groups: Methodological Challenges and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Rainer Eising
Rainer Eising*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, University St. 150, GC 04/146, Bochum D-44801, Germany
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on interest groups has evolved from a focus on small-N studies to larger-N studies in the past 15 years. While both European and American research has become more sophisticated and aware of methodological aspects, there is yet no specialized literature on methods regarding how to study interest groups. Only few studies discuss the methodological implications of interest group studies, as well as the transferability of methods employed in other areas of political science to this research area. The contributions in this symposium focus on major problems and topics in interest group research and elaborate methods to deal with them: (1) the identification of the relevant interest group population, (2) the analysis of interest group strategies such as access, (3) the identification of interest groups positions and frames, and (4) the measurement of interest group success and influence. The introduction outlines these research problems and describes how the contributions to this symposium address them. The aim of the symposium is to increase awareness of the intricacies of these research problems, outline suitable practices to handle them, and stimulate debate on these methodological aspects.

Keywords

interest groupsresearch methodsmethodology

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
European Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2017, pp. 291 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barry, B. (1980a) ‘Is it better to be powerful or lucky? Part 1’, Political Studies 28(2): 183-94. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb01244.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. (1980b) ‘Is it better to be powerful or lucky? Part 2’, Political Studies 28(3): 338-52. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1980.tb00473.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B. (1998) Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2008) ‘Counting organized interests in the European union: A comparison of data sources’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 489-213. 10.1080/13501760801996683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J. (2004) ‘Voice and access. Political practices of European interest associations’, European Union Politics 5(2): 211-240 10.1177/1465116504042442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Chaqués Bonafont, L., Dür, A., Eising, R., Fink-Hafner, D., Lowery, D., Mahoney, C., Maloney, W. and Naurin, D. (2014a) ‘The INTEREURO project: Logic and structure’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 126-40. 10.1057/iga.2014.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D. and Wonka, A. (2014b) ‘Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO project’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 160-73. 10.1057/iga.2014.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008a) ‘Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know?’, West European Politics 31(6): 1103-28. 10.1080/01402380802370443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008b) ‘Conclusion: Embedding interest groups research’, West European Politics 31(6): 1292-302. 10.1080/01402380802372696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. (2005) ‘Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure’, Political Studies 53(4): 694-715 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. and Pedersen, H. H. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘What is access? A discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boräng, F., Eising, R., Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., Naurin, D., Rasch, D. and Rozbicka, P. (2014) ‘Measuring frames: A comparison of methodological alternatives’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 188-201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwen, P. and McCown, M. (2007) ‘Lobbying versus litigation: Political and legal strategies of interest representation in the European union’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 422-43. 10.1080/13501760701243798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunea, A. and Baumgartner, F. (2014) ‘The state of the discipline: Authorship, research designs, and citation patterns in studies of EU interest groups and lobbying’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1412-34. 10.1080/13501763.2014.936483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunea, A. and Ibenskas, R. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Estimating interest groups’ policy positions through content analysis: A discussion of automated and human-coding text analysis techniques applied to studies of EU lobbying’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, A.W. (2011) ‘Interests, information and influence: Comparing the influence of interests groups in the European union’, Journal of European Integration 33(4): 471-86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Figueiredo, J.M. and Richter, B.K. (2014) ‘Advancing the empirical research on lobbying’, Annual Review of Political Science 17 163-85. 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. (1996) Power, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Dür, A. (2008) ‘Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology’, European Union Politics 9(4): 559-76. 10.1177/1465116508095151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A., Bernhagen, P. and Marshall, D. (2015) ‘Interest group success in the European union: When (and Why) does business lose?’, Comparative Political Studies 48(8): 951-83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2014) ‘The Europeanization of interest groups: Group type, resources and policy area’, European Union Politics 15(4): 572-94. 10.1177/1465116514532556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, R. (2008) ‘Interest group in EU policymaking’, Living Reviews in European Governance 3(4): 7-32 10.12942/lreg-2008-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, R. and Spohr, F. (2015) The more, the merrier? Interest groups and legislative change in the public hearings of the German parliamentary committees. Presentation at the 6th ECPR Standing Group Summer School on Interest Groups, 20–28 July, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Eising, R., Rasch, D. and Rozbicka, P. (2015) ‘Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 516-533 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gais, T.L. and Walker, J.L. (1991) ‘Pathways to Influence in American Politics’, in Walker, J.L. (ed.) Mobilizing Interest Groups in America Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 103-22.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, J. and Stewart, B.M. (2013) ‘Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts’, Political Analysis 21(3): 267-97. 10.1093/pan/mps028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, D. and Jordan, G. (eds.) (2012) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230359239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C., Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M. and Leech, B.L. (2012) ‘Studying organizational advocacy and influence: Re-examining interest groups research’, Annual Review of Political Science 15(9): 1 2110.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G., Darren, H. and Maloney, W. (2004) ‘Defining interests: Disambiguation and the need for new distinctions’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6(2): 195-212 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00134.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008) ‘Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science 19(5): 729-52. 10.1287/orsc.1070.0340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H. (2009) ‘Measuring interest group influence using quantitative text analysis’, European Union Politics 10(4): 535-49. 10.1177/1465116509346782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H., Braun, C. and Beyers, J. (2015) ‘Legislative lobbying in context: Towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European union’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 447-61. 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klüver, H., Mahoney, C. and Opper, M. (2015) ‘Framing in context: How interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 481-98. 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, B., Quittkat, C. and Kurczweska, U. (2013) ‘Interest intermediation in the European Union revisited: Report on a survey study’, Arbeitspapiere des Mannheimer Zentrums für Europäische Sozialforschung 151.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Latham, E. (1952) ‘The group basis of politics: Notes for a theory’, American Political Science Review 46(2): 376-97. 10.2307/1950835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. (2003) ‘Estimating the policy positions of political actors using words as data’, American Political Science Review 97(2): 311-31. 10.1017/S0003055403000698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1979) ‘Wandlungen der Interessenpolitik im liberalen Korporatismus’, in Aleman, U. von and Heinze, R.G. (eds.) Verbände und Staat, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag 50-71.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
March, J. (1955) ‘An introduction to the theory and measurement of influence’, American Political Science Review 49(2): 431-51. 10.2307/1951813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, R.H. (1984) ‘Interest representation: The dominance of institutions’, American Political Science Review 78(1): 64-78. 10.2307/1961249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. and Goodin, R.E. (2006) ‘It Depends’, in Goodin, R.E. and Tilly, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-32.Google Scholar
Vannoni, M. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying preference attainment using spatial models’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varone, F., Ingold, K. and Jourdain, C. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying policy advocacy through social network analysis’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltolini, B. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process tracing methods’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonka, A., Baumgartner, F.R., Mahoney, C. and Berkhout, J. (2010) ‘Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population’, European Union Politics 11(3): 463-76. 10.1177/1465116510369267CrossRefGoogle Scholar