Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:52:53.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Mechanisms Seriously?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Derek Beach
Derek Beach*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Bartholinsalle 7, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
*
E-mail: derek@ps.au.dk
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The questions address the ontological and epistemological implications of taking the ‘mechanismic’ view of causal mechanisms seriously, suggesting that they are more than events or series of intervening variables. Peter Hall is asked his views on the nature of causal mechanisms, and the logics of inference that we can use to study them in within-case analysis.

Keywords

causal mechanismswithin-case analysisprocess tracingcase studiesvariables

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
European Political Science , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2013, pp. 13 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bennett, A. (2008) ‘Process-tracing: A Bayesian perspective’, in Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., Brady, H.E. and Collier, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 702–721.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. (2008) ‘The Mother of all “isms”: Organizing Political Science Around Causal Mechanisms’, in Groff, R. (ed.) Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science, London: Routledge, pp. 205–219.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1997) ‘Mechanism and explanation’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27(4): 410–465.10.1177/004839319702700402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, T.G. and Lynch, J.F. (2009) ‘Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 42(9): 1143–1166.10.1177/0010414009331724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007) ‘The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box, (Review Article)’, British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 161–179 10.1017/S0007123408000082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2010) ‘Causal mechanisms: Yes, but…’, Comparative Political Studies 43(11): 1499–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, S.S. (1996) ‘Mechanisms and the nature of causation’, Erkenntnis 44(1): 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P.A. (2006) ‘Systematic process analysis: When and how to use it’, European Management Review 3: 24–31.10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, P. (2010) ‘Causal mechanisms in the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. (1996) ‘Causal explanation in the social sciences’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 S1 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L. and Craver, C.F. (2000) ‘Thinking about mechanisms’, Philosophy of Science 67(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2001) ‘Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method’, Sociological Forum 16(3): 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldner, D. (2010) ‘What are mechanisms and what are they good for?’, QMMR Newsletter 34, 8(2): 30–34 Google Scholar
Waldner, D. (2012) ‘Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms’, in Kincaid, H. (ed.)Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar