Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-w5jd6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T05:02:46.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When candidates are more polarised than voters: constitutional revision in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Kenneth Mori McElwain*
Affiliation:
Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Abstract

The study of mass-elite policy congruence has been limited by the lack of comprehensive data on the preferences and priorities of individual legislators. The University of Tokyo-Asahi Survey fills this lacuna through elite surveys whose response rates exceed ninety per cent. This article applies this data to comparing mass-elite policy preferences on constitutional revision, a core ideological dimension in post-war Japan. It shows that legislators generally follow the party line on policy position but veer closer to swing voters on policy prioritisation. This trend is stronger for electorally insecure legislators, who depend on independent voters to secure victory.

Information

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable