Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:39:51.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Belief systems as coping factors for traumatized refugees: a pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Michael Brune
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini Str.52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
Christian Haasen*
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini Str.52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
Michael Krausz
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini Str.52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
Oktay Yagdiran
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini Str.52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
Enrique Bustos
Affiliation:
Institute for Psychotherapy and Intercultural Communication (IPIK), Stockholm, Sweden
David Eisenman
Affiliation:
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:haasen@uke.uni-hamburg.de (C. Haasen).
Get access

Summary

The severity of traumatization seems to correlate with a more severe course of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (and other post-traumatic disorders), while firm belief systems have been found to be a protective factor against post-traumatic disorders. This study sought to determine the role of belief systems in the outcome of psychotherapy for traumatized refugees. The charts of 141 consecutively treated refugees were evaluated retrospectively. A firm belief system was found to be an important predictor for a better therapy outcome. The importance of a firm belief system as a coping factor, which should be used as an instrument in therapy, is discussed. © 2002 Éditions scientifiques et médicals Elsevier SAS

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.