Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T09:30:26.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing an 8-Session Transdiagnostic Metacognitive Therapy Group Protocol: A Pilot Study with 6-Month Follow-Up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2026

K. Ozdel*
Affiliation:
Etlik City Hospital/Psychiatry Clinic, University of Health Sciences
M. Çelik-Korkmaz
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Department, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Introduction

Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) targets maladaptive metacognitions and the cognitive attentional syndrome (CAS) (Wells 2009). Transdiagnostic interventions are increasingly encouraged to address comorbidity efficiently and to improve cost-effectiveness (McEvoy et al. 2009). However, structured brief group protocols with long-term follow-up remain limited.

Objectives

This pilot study developed and tested an 8-session manualized transdiagnostic group MCT protocol for adults with mixed anxiety and depressive symptoms, examining both immediate and 6-month outcomes.

Methods

Twelve participants (gathered from 3 groups) completed the intervention. The protocol included detached mindfulness, attention training, and modification of maladaptive beliefs. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-months: Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), CAS-1, and Outcome Rating Scale (ORS). Within-group analyses were performed with paired tests.

Results

Significant pre- to post-treatment improvements were observed across all primary measures, with large to very large effect sizes (Table 1). At 6-month follow-up, reductions in depression, anxiety, and CAS, and improvements in functioning were maintained. Comparisons between post-treatment and follow-up were not significant (p = 0.191–0.949), suggesting stability of gains.Table 1.

Key outcomes (Mean ± SD) and effect sizes

MeasurePrePost6-mod (Pre–Post)
CGI-S4.42 ± 0.511.58 ± 0.991.75 ± 1.062.54
BDI22.58 ± 10.759.25 ± 10.2210.08 ± 9.810.89
BAI32.92 ± 11.6615.83 ± 10.9217.00 ± 11.210.86
CAS–1934.79 ± 138.41379.38 ± 245.25401.67 ± 240.122.10
ORS16.82 ± 6.7933.00 ± 8.9831.92 ± 9.450.86
A data table showing key outcomes and effect sizes for five clinical measures across three time points. See long description.Table 2.

Structure of the 8-Session Transdiagnostic MCT Protocol

SessionKey focus
AssessmentHistory, consent, baseline measures
1Orientation, model introduction, detached mindfulness
2Review, thought suppression, worry management
3Review, attention training, danger beliefs
4Review, consolidation of danger belief modification
5Review, positive metacognitive beliefs, belief testing
6Review, skill consolidation, practice
7Review, old vs. new plan exercise
8Review, termination, relapse plan
A table outlining the 8-Session Transdiagnostic M C T Protocol, listing the key focus for each session from assessment to relapse planning. See long description.

Conclusions

An 8-session transdiagnostic MCT group protocol was feasible, well accepted, and associated with robust reductions in distress, maladaptive metacognitions, and CAS, alongside improvements in functioning. Gains were sustained at 6 months, with no significant decline or further improvement, highlighting stability of effects. Despite encouraging outcomes, the small and uncontrolled nature of this study limits generalizability. Larger randomized controlled trials are required.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Information

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.