No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Computer-based Technique for Rapidly Screening Intercropping Designs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2008
Summary
A computer technique for predicting the yields of the component crops in intercropping systems is described. Predictions using this procedure showed reasonable agreement with results obtained in an experiment using tomatoes and dry beans. Reasons for the discrepancies observed and limitations to the applications of the technique are discussed.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986
References
REFERENCES
Bach, C. E. (1980). Effects of plant density and diversity on a specialist herbivore, the striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittata (Fab.). Ecology 61:1515–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, D. C. L. (1978). Polyculture Cropping Systems: Review and Analysis. Cornell International Agricultural Bulletin No. 32, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Martin, F. B. (1973). Beehive designs for observing variety competition. Biometrics 29:397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, D. & Stern, R. D. (1981). Statistical considerations in experiments to investigate intercropping. In International Workshop on Intercropping, 263–276 (Ed. Willey, R. W.). Hyderabad, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Moss, P. A. & Hartwig, N. L. (1980). Competitive control of common lambs quarters in a corn-soybean intercrop. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 34:21–28.Google Scholar
Pappendick, R. L, Sanchez, P. A. & Triplett, G. B. eds (1976). Multiple Cropping. American Society of Agronomy, Special Publication No. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchinat, A. M., Soria, J. & Bazan, R. (1976). Multiple cropping in Tropical America. In Multiple Cropping, 51–61 (Eds Pappendick, R. I., Sanchez, P. A. & Triplett, G. B.). American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Risen, S. J. (1983). Intercropping as cultural pest control: prospects and limitations. Environmental Management 7:9–14.Google Scholar
Schultz, B., Phillips, C., Rosset, P. & Vandermeer, J. (1982). An experiment in intercropping tomatoes and cucumbers in southern Michigan, U.S.A. Scientia Horticulturae 18:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinozaki, K. & Kira, T. (1965). Intra-specific competition among higher plants. VII Logistic theory of the C-D effect. Journal of the Institute of the Polytechnic Institute, Osaka (D) 7:35–72.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. W. (1982). Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. (1984). Plant demography in agricultural systems. In Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology (Eds Dirzo, R. & Sarukan, J.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. & Harris, P. M. (1979). Nutrient interactions and rooting patterns below ground – the use of nutrients and water. In International Workshop on Intercropping, 188–201 (Ed. Willey, R. W.). Hyderabad, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Soria, J., Bazan, R., Pinchinat, A. M., Paez, G., Mateo, N., Moreno, R., Fargas, J. & Forsythe, W. (1975). Investigacion sobre sistemas de produccion agricola para el pequeno agricultor del tropico. Turrialba 25:283–293.Google Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixture. Advances in Agronomy 26:177–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1976). Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In Multiple Cropping, 129–170 (Eds Pappendick, R. I., Sanchez, P. A. & Triplett, G. B.). American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1981). The interference production principle: an ecological theory for agriculture. Bioscience 31:361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1984a). The interpretation and design of intercrop systems involving environmental modification by one of the components: a theoretical framework. Journal of Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 2:135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1984b). Plant competition and the yield-density relation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 109:393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H., Gliessman, S., Yih, K. & Amador, M. (1983). Overyielding in a corn-cowpea system in southern Mexico. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 1:83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H., Ambrose, R. J., Hansen, M. K., McGuinness, H., Perfecto, I., Phillips, C., Rosset, P. & Schultz, B. (1984). An ecologically-based approach to the design of intercrop agroecosystems: An intercropping system of soybeans and tomatoes in southern Michigan. Ecological Modelling 25:121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, A. & Boffey, T. B. (1975). On the existence of levelled beehive designs. Biometrics 31:963–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkinson, A. R. (1980). Density-dependence in a single species population of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83:345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. (1977). Pests and disease status in mixed stands versus monocultures; the relevance of ecosystem stability. In Origins of Pest, Parasite, Disease, and Weed Problems, 127–138 (Eds Cherrett, J. M. & Sugar, G. R.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
White, J. (1975). Patterns of thinning of plant populations. Twelfth International Botanical Congress, Leningrad.Google Scholar
White, J. & Harper, J. L. (1970). Correlated changes in plant size and number in plant populations. Journal of Ecology 58:467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Field Crop Abstracts 32:1–10 and 73–85.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. ed. (1981). Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping. Hyderabad, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H. & Hozumi, K. (1963). Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal of Biology of Osaka City University 14:107–129.Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by