Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:11:41.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intercropped Corn-Soyabean Density Studies. II. Yield Composition and Protein†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. H. Putnam
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
S. J. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
A. Vargas
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Summary

If corn-soyabean intercrops are to replace corn grown alone, maintenance of yield and improvements in forage quality are important. Total yields and inter-crop competition in corn-soyabean intercropping experiments have been discussed previously (Putnam et al., 1985). In Part II yield composition, components and protein content are presented for intercrops of varying planting patterns and corn densities. Most intercrop patterns produced more forage than sole crops compared at the same yield ratio of corn-soyabean as in the intercrop harvested mixture. At high plant density ear yields in the intercrop were increased while in sole crops they were reduced or unaffected. The increase was a result of an increased number of ears, weight per ear and kernel, and number of kernels per row in the intercrops. Increases in crude protein content over sole crop corn of 11–51% were shown for the various intercrop treatments. Crude protein yields in the intercrops were greater than either sole crop in 1981 and greater than corn and similar to soyabean in 1982, and greater than the crude protein yields expected from an equal planted area of sole crop corn and soyabean in both years. Intercrop forage quality was improved over sole corn both by the addition of protein from soyabean pods and an increased ear: stover ratio of the intercropped corn.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable