Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T19:10:25.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlations, Path Analyses and Selection Indices for Castorbean (Ricinus communis L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

S. H. Salih and
M. O. Khidir
S. H. Salih
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Shambat, Democratic Republic of the Sudan
M. O. Khidir
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Shambat, Democratic Republic of the Sudan
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Genotypic correlations and path coefficients were used to determine the importance of various characters as components of yield in castorbean. Number of primary branches per plant and 100-seed weight had high positive correlations with yield per plant and with each other. Oil content was significantly and positively correlated with 100-seed weight. The path analysis revealed that number of clusters per plant, number of branches, height at maturity and yield of the first spike had the highest direct effect on yield per plant. Sixteen selection indices were constructed using these four yield components, the index combining all four being about 54 per cent more efficient than straight selection based on yield alone.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1975, pp. 145 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Chaudhary, M. A. (1965). W. Pakistan J. agric. Res. 3, 129.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. R. & Lu, K. H. (1959). Agron. J. 51, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingo, W. E. (1945). Seed Wld 57, 8.Google Scholar
Haskel, G. (1954). Am. Nat. 89, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiepko, G. H. (1966). Annual Report, 1965/66, Hudeiba Res. Stn, Ed-Dammer, Sudan.Google Scholar
Hooks, J. A. (1967). Diss. Abstr. 2228-B (order No. 67–15, 822).Google Scholar
Hooks, J. A., Williams, J. H. & Gardner, C. O. (1971). Crop Sci. 11, 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaisani, B. G. & Patel, R. M. (1963). Indian Oilseeds J. 7, 295.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, L. G. (1959). Castor. Hyderabad: Indian Central Oilseeds Committee.Google Scholar
Lal, V. S. & Haque, Md. F. (1971). Indian J. Genet. 31, 357.Google Scholar
Memon, M. I. A. & Munshi, Z. A. (1969). W. Pakistan J. agric. Res. 7, 87.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A., Williams, J. C., Robinson, H. F. & Comstock, R. E. (1958). Agron. J. 50, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E. & Harvey, P. H. (1951). Agron. J. 43, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salih, S. H. & Khidir, M. O. (1974). Sudan Agric. J. 9 (in press).Google Scholar
Sethi, R. L. (1931). Agric. Livestock India. 1, 243.Google Scholar
Sindagi, S. S. (1965). Indian Oilseeds J. 9, 224.Google Scholar
Sindagi, S. S., Swarup, V. & Singh, D. (1970). Indian J. Genet. 30, 654.Google Scholar
Varisai Muhammad, S., Sprinivasalu, N., Navakodi, K., Ramasamy, N. M., Dorairaj, S. M. & Paramasivan, K. S. (1970). Madras agric. J. 57, 420.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). J. agric. Res. 20, 557.Google Scholar