Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:28:20.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Variability in Root Development in Relation to Drought Tolerance in Spring Wheats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

N. F. Derera,
D. R. Marshall and
L. N. Balaam
N. F. Derera
Affiliation:
University of Sydney North West Wheat Research Institute, P.O. Box 219, Narrabri, 2390, N.S.W., Australia
D. R. Marshall
Affiliation:
University of Sydney North West Wheat Research Institute, P.O. Box 219, Narrabri, 2390, N.S.W., Australia
L. N. Balaam
Affiliation:
University of Sydney North West Wheat Research Institute, P.O. Box 219, Narrabri, 2390, N.S.W., Australia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fifteen Australian and exotic wheat varieties revealed genotypic differences in their patterns of root development and drought tolerance. Earliness in plant maturity, which accounted for 40 to go per cent of the observed variation in drought tolerance, appeared to be by far the most important characteristic of tolerant genotypes, but there nevertheless appeared to be a measurable relationship between some parameters of root development, water use efficiency and drought tolerance. The impact of study of this kind on the problem of breeding for drought tolerance is briefly discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1969, pp. 327 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. H. & George, R. W. (1956). Qld. J. Agric. Sci. 13, 19.Google Scholar
Bloodworth, M. E., Burleson, C. A. & Cowley, W. R. (1958). Agron. J. 50, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, G. W. (1959). Adv. in Agron. II, 104.Google Scholar
Chinoy, J. J. (1960). Phyton, 14, 147.Google Scholar
Evans, H. (1938). Ann. Bot. N. S. 2, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, R. G. (1967). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1960). Soil. Sci. 89, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1961). Arid Zone Research XVI, 93.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1964). Agron. J. 56, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. R. & Ehlig, C. F. (1962). Agron. J. 54, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Il'inskaja-Centilovic, M. A. & Teherjatcenko, K. G. (1961). Plant Breeding Abstracts 32, 323.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M. C. (1961). Canad. J. Plt Sci. 41, 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, J. W. & Harvey, C. (1962). Agron. J. 54, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogata, G., Richards, L. A. & Gardner, W. R. (1960). Soil Sci. 89, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, S. A., Fox, W. E. & Teakle, L. J. H. (1958a). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, S. A., Fox, W. E., & Teakle, L. J. H. (1958b). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar